Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Commissioner Reeve inquired if staff has had any discussions with the applicant regarding the <br />City Staff letter. <br /> <br />Community Development Assistant Wald replied yes, noting that the applicant has ageed to do <br />everything included in the letter. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Reeves, to <br />Case # 10 to give the applicant time to be present for the discussions. <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />until after <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, <br />Sweet, and Wivoda. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #7: Request for Preliminary Plat A The <br /> Realty <br /> <br />of Royal Oaks <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt closed the regular portion of the Planning <br />order to call the public hearing to order. <br /> <br />sion meeting at 8:11 p.m. in <br /> <br />Public Hearing <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt called the public, hearing to 1 p.m. <br /> <br />Presentation ,.~!':~i'i ;! '~" 577~, <br /> <br />Principal Planner T~dgeon state&~f~'R.0yg[Oaks [,.. , has submitted a preliminary plat <br />showing the developrfien~'of 86;7,!~ii:~r~:~di~ of Dysprosium St. ~d Nowthen <br />Boulevard. ~eyal Oak~Real~}~'~roposing to ~¢elop 73 s~gle-family lots, 152 tow~ome <br />units an&82 apament unitS~O~:~this prope~. ~e prope~y w~ r~oved from the development <br />moratonm on Feb--..16, 20Q[:t~i:~As pa~ of ~s plat, ~e apphcant ~s also as~ng to rezone ~e <br />prop&~'to Pla~ed ~}~evelo~(P.U.D.), to receive a vmance ~om ~e height <br />restrictions for the prop6~d~apa~m~ building, ~d site plan approvals ot ~e tow~ouse <br />development and apa~meh~ Building. ~e prope~ is c~ently zoned R-1, Single Family and B- <br />1, B~Sb~ss. As mentione~'~¢ove, the applic~t is as~ng for a rezo~ng of the prope~ to P.U.D. <br />The March.2001 Drag. c~m~rehensive Plan shows a total of 7.52 acres of tbs prope~ being <br />High Densi'~ Keside~:al;' 13.52 acres being Medium Densi~ Residential ~d 65.67 acres as <br />Low Densi~ ReSidential. The number ofu~ts ~at the development shows is less th~ the <br />maximum number~f units that would be allowed under the March 2001 Drag Comprehensive <br />Land Use Map. Approximately 340 u~ts would be allowed if the development is a P.U.D. <br />Royal Oaks Realty shows 307 dwelling units. ~e prope~ contains 86.71 acres with 28.02 of <br />these acres classified as wetlands. ~e prelimina~ plat shows a ~oss densi~ of 3.54 u~ts per <br />acre. ~en the wetlands are factored out, the net densi~ for the whole devdopment is 5.23 units <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 5, 2001 <br /> Page 8 of 30 <br /> <br />_:--257- <br /> <br /> <br />