My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/26/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 06/26/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:24:07 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 12:47:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/26/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
449
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> I <br /> I <br />:1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />vehicles out of the development in the peak a.m. hours. During the peak p.m. period 115 <br />vehicles will be entering the development and 61 vehicles will be leaving the development. <br />Based on their analysis ten percent of the residents from "The Ponds" development would use <br />CSAH #5, 10 percent would use T.H. #47 to the north, 10 percent would use DYsprosium Street, <br />and the remaining 60 percent would go south on T.H. #47. The proposed conditions at all three <br />locations would be an acceptable level of service. Dysprosium would have an additional 30 to <br />35 trips during the peak periods and Iodine Street would have an increase to ten trips <br />during the peak periods. Mr. Corkle recommended that a westbound land and an <br />eastbound turn lane be provided along CSAH #5 into the development. <br /> <br />Mike Black, Royal Oaks Realty, . stated that the property is <br />CSAH. #5, and the westerly portion of the property is zoned <br />recent draft of the Comprehensive Plan identifies the site as <br />to the Commission was in conformance with the Comp <br />print" the City has for the site. Mr. Black also <br />neighborhood to discuss the development. The key <br />that the area is unique and they don't want to lose <br />property that are currently heavily used. He explained to <br />big element of their plan and they would lik~.to expand on it, <br />of the existing wetland. Mr. Black <br />development would occur some day on <br />but they do want to make sure that it is <br />possible. He did discuss the possibility of <br />trees to the outer edge of the dev:elopment. <br />trees would have to be rem'C~d ~fi/0rder' for <br />services. The neighborsTexp?essed a;S~ong <br />and he has pledged to d°!~i~at, Once,:{~;.~k have <br />will take another 106k'at tree <br />in traffic. Mr. Bla~l~:-exp <br /> <br /> The plan <br />Plan.and reflects <br /> <br /> along <br />z's most <br /> sented <br /> <br /> were the meeting were <br /> linear trails across the <br /> that the trail system is a <br /> as keeping the nature view <br /> understood that <br /> are the development, <br /> to see as many trees saved as <br /> as many pine <br />level of the development most of the <br />construct the road way and put in City <br />control tree removal around the perimeter <br />of way for road construction they <br />of concern had to do with the increase <br />only be one connection to the existing <br /> <br />neighborhood ,t9 the nortlii, i: ~e;0ther main area of concern had to do with the retention ponds. <br />They are:et~'~h~lY proposi:ngi'~retention ponds on the site that are required by the water shed <br />districlf~ii':Thsk'~"'P'°nd~ are th~/~e~i~!~handle run-off from the impervious surfaces. Some of the <br />pcmdslr'~511 be dry pohd~;;and so~'~i'!}~, be wet ponds. The other area of Concern had to do with <br />the'i.~ktension of 145t~ C~fi~. He e~'iained that the existing nei~hbors are very concerned with <br />kd~ffig the natural aesth~fi~k. Mr. Black has indicated to those neighbors that those seven lots <br />woul&be.,custom lots, which means that they will be left in there natural state and then the <br />developer *i~'! ,decide h0~i:~; develop the site once they have a buyer. <br /> <br />Tom Chesness~ 5~2~. 145 Court, ~amsey, stated that he was told that the land across ~om his <br />home could not be developed because there was not enough high land and know they are being <br />told that it will be developed on. He.personally did not think the site was buildable. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sweet inquired as to why Mr. Chesness did not think the land was buildable <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 5, 2001 <br /> Page 10 of 30 <br /> <br />~259- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.