My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/10/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 07/10/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:24:33 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 1:48:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/10/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Albrecht stated that the height of the building will be a real issue for her. She did not think <br />that the variance should be granted. She felt that the apartment building should be built in a <br />different area of the City. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt inquired if Ms. Albrecht would approve of the building if they met the height <br />restriction requirements. <br /> <br />Ms. Albrecht replied that she does not want to see the apartment <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt inquired as to how the proposed building coml: <br />senior complex. ~,~.~;~¢~ ' <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon replied that he was not sure with <br /> nou~:~."~gearching the <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt inquired as to what the response t~eS¢~as ir needed t~ <br />adjoining city for assistance· ~'~.':~;~i¢ <br /> <br />the existing <br /> <br />Jerry Streich, Ramsey Fire Department, replied that the <br />senior housing complex would be 15 to 17 minutes. Anoka <br />minutes. <br /> <br /> from Elk River to the <br />fastest response time at six <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt inquired as to what <br />Department if the City had its own aerial <br /> <br />the Ramsey Fire <br /> <br />Mr. Strelch rephed that the. 'Ramseg ~e could respond in 15 minutes, including a <br />s~x to eight m~nute tr~p0rt t~me g6i:iCthe fire for the firefighters. He noted that the <br />previous response t~meS:~did not inch~the six to m~utes for the ~efi~ters to reach their <br /> <br />Board Member Sweet. ~t'ate'd:'~at if the CiW stays wi~ their regulations of the 35 .feet.they <br />would not:~[~'}~chas~¢~ehal ladder track. ' ' <br />eo~a,M'ember Jo~;';'~7~,i,ed"~i~f~, Ram..y Fi,e D.pament wo~d b. due to re.~ue .people <br />~om.the bmld~ng, w~th thmr,exmt~ng eqmpment, w~th the proposed window heights. <br /> <br />~. 's~eh .t.t.6 that t~..o, th.y a.e ...o~ending ae~a~ of ~e v~.n.e h.. to do with <br />public safe¢!.~gS well as:?coacem of the prop~. Sava~a O~s was ~ted a ~ne foot vm~ce <br /> una~}~d~,~t the Ci, would be purchasing ~ aehal ladder rock ~ the near <br />with <br /> the <br />In this case t~:.}~.~:~;~roposing a 15 foot height deviation ~d thee is no proposal <br /> to <br /> include <br />decks on ~e builfl~fig. ~e Ramsey Fire Dep~ent has 1Mders thru will reach the windows, but <br />they would have to walk ~ound to the back of the build~g to get the ladder up, whch is why the <br />dhving pad was reco~ended. ~e build~g will be cons~cted ~ compliance with the State <br />Fire Code, but the Ci~ c~ot restrict where h~dicapped people c~ live with~ the building. <br /> <br />Board of Adjustment/June 5, 2001 <br /> Page 7 of 11 <br /> <br />-17- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.