Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson inquired if the City had reasonable control over which trees could be <br />kept. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt inquired when the site is graded what type of grade change would have to <br />occur to make it difficult to preserve trees. <br /> <br />Mr. Black replied that they have presented a tree preservation plan to <br />that the trees on the southerly portion of the property, off of Fluorine <br />some to the north of the property including the peninsula they will <br />preserve those trees and match the grading plan. On the upper <br />tree removal to accommodate townhomes and single-family <br /> <br />He explained <br />and <br />to <br />substantial <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt inquired if there will be substantial <br />trail corridor, but as they move towards the center there <br /> <br />Mr. Black replied yes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson stated that on the peninsula Mr. <br />total tree preservation, but will the City <br />purchases the property. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik <br />by lot basis with the developer~:but.:.9~¢~ce someo! <br />Chairperson Nixt inquire'd'ii;'i'~ woul~':j~ possible <br /> <br />Community Development <br /> <br /> that they will show <br />control o~ i removal When someone <br /> <br /> tree preservation on a lot <br /> property they have very little contro1. <br /> <br />something in the PUD. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt inq per was far enough along with the grading analysis to <br />know for 'SU~;'~:kt ,:' they ¢~/hi.'~Xtend City services without substantially changing 'topography <br />along, theilp~ni'~s~l~i!~ i: ii ;,~,,, ~ ' :~i!i!,~:,~ ~ ?~, ~ . <br /> <br /> ~:B. lack replied yes. "i!!:i?'!~ <br /> <br /> Chai~kon. Nixt reques~{~:.~hat staff dra~ a document ~anWing ~ee prese~ation as pan of <br /> <br /> % ,5::.,. ,~:~ :~:;':7.3: <br />Co~issioner';S~'~f:'}tated that she understands that an impact statement is not required, but <br />was not sure as t6:~hy an enviromental ~sessment is not required. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon stated that the requirements for an environment assessment on a <br />residential subdivisions to be completed in the metro area if there is more than 250 single family <br />homes or 275 multi family homes. If it is a mixed use development they have to meet a score of <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 5, 2001 <br /> Page 17 of 30 <br /> <br />-30- <br /> <br /> <br />