My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/10/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 07/10/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:24:33 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 1:48:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/10/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-40- <br /> <br /> ! <br />1 and this development rates at a .91 so it is not required, but the residents could petition that one I <br />be completed. <br />Resident stated that she had the rules regarding the environmental assessment and explained that I <br />citizens can put together a petition containing description of the environmental affects and <br />evidence of those affects and have it signed,by 25 residents. At that point the City Council <br />would have to decide whether or not to accept the petition. <br />Chairperson Nixt inquired if the density requirements were based off the e~i~:} Comprehensive I <br />Plan or the proposed Comprehensive Plan. <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon replied that, staff used the proposed '~mprehens~,~:~lan. The <br />devel;pment as a whole they could have o40 units and they are:'~iSCsing 307 units. ?,';;' ~,i <br /> <br />Motion. by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Cha,~ieY~g~n Nixt, ,~p. recommend <br />Council approve the preliminary plat subject to the Ci~{i:~taff reviem:}~er dated June 1, 2001 <br />and contingent upon the control over tree preservatioh~.!ai~d, the f~i~fi'i~ation of a dealing with 8 <br />drainage and neighboring properties, exp, Joring the,,envir~ei~ml:::issue, ongoing dialog with} <br />property.owners and staff across from the dog house lot, and~'~i;~proved PUD. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairpers~?'.~;~ti!;~C~'~ssioners~"J:)~son, Kociscak, Reeves, ! <br />Sweet, and Watson. Voting No: None. ~ ~'"~;~'i;>' I <br />Case #8: Request to ,R__~g~,Property.:~p,~:2g-1 Business and R-1 Single Family <br /> Residential:tCplanfie'aUnit De¢~il/Pment; Case of Royal Oaks Realty, Inc. I <br />Chairperson Nixt cloS~'d {t~e regul~,;Pt~'rtion of thd'~i~ing Commission meeting at 10:26 p.m. <br />in order to call the :l~iic hearing ,t61~:aer:~i~ ~: .... :~i~? I <br />Ch~~ ~i~F&a~h~the p~gii~::~hearing to-order at '10:26 p.m. I <br /> <br />Princi~a[~;~!anner Trudge0n-~ated that Royal Oaks Realty has submitted an application to rezone <br />prope~;15'~ated at the sd~fl~west corner of CSAH 5 (Nowthen Blvd.) and Dysprosium Street I <br />from B-1 ~s arf~R5'i Single Family Residential to Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.). <br />The rezoning'~d'j~ll;w the property to be subdivided for 73 single-family lots, 152 townhome <br />units and 82 apartment units. The property is 86.71 acres in size and is within the Metropolitan <br />Urban Service Area (MUSA). The preliminary plat accompanying the application proposes to <br />develop 73 single family homes on the western part of the property, 152 townhomes along I <br />Nowthen Blvd., and a 82 unit apartment building for senior citizens along Dysprosium St. The <br />current Comprehensive Plan identifies this area for commercial and single family development, <br /> 1 <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 5, 2001 <br /> Page 18 of 30 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.