Agenda - Council - 08/14/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I Request for Site Plan Review; Case of SW Wold: North Pine I I I City Council/June 26, 2001 Page 12 of 27 Case #7: Community Development Assistant Wald stated that SW Wold is proposi~i;i~) ~0~Iruct a 12,335 square foot multi-tenant office building on the property gen~t~y located;:~:'i~t',':-~the intersection of 153a Avenue and State Highway #10. The applicant is proposing to constmcf:a. multi-tenant office facility on a 1.7-acre parcel. The property is .zoned B;!:./~_usiness, facilities are a permitted use. The office facility will consist of tw6::~ls~ the 9,379 square feet in size and the second floor will contain 9,9'516;i:~',' uaf~/feet for a total office building area of 12,335 square feet. The proposed building:~c~eds the r~:~uired front, rear and side yard setbacks established in the B-1 Business Distn.'~..~:~,?City Code.:~esthcts lot coverage to 35% of the lot area; the site plan is proposing a 16% lot~;b~;~rage. In a~'~dance with City Code, all driveways, off-street parking and maneuveringi'm~a~:/'are proposid"i~'-:be surfaced with bituminous pavement and finished with B-6/12 concre'te curb}ngi: Ci~3C'0de ]:~quires a minimum of 55 parking spaces for the proposed office facility. The site Planli~i~'roposing 62 customer and employee parking stalls. City code specifies that exterior wall fin}'S~-shall consist of natural or prefabricated brick or stone or integrally treated pre-cast concrete l~'~'h'~ts.or.,o~i~ materials as approved by City Council. The build~i~'~:ete~ation plan indicates that tl~ii:ext~'C~i~ wall materials will consist of rock face concrete,~i%ka~d v/~X~'~S~ding. The proposed c6~i~te block should be integrally treated with color..-~.~The-;Pr0b°ged vin'~i'~'kiding is ..a deviation~m City code and will require City Council approval.";The grading plan is proPosing.~6 ex~vate and utilize City owned property located to the north of the subj'~ct prop~:/'The~Opo~d drainage plan would be maximizing the ponding capacity on city, pmpe~Z~nd theref0f:e'iimiting future development's drainage options...Thedevelopment is proP0~:~g"to derive one' access point from 153~d Avenue, no access poin~'~ilt be' der/red from State ~hway #10. Staff sent a copy of the proposed site plan to MnD'OT::for their r'ehew and comm'ertt.sin~,the parcel boarders State Highway #10 along th,~ S~{~rn edge of the~oundary line. ~i:b~iii/~'ervices are not available to the site and the facility fs:~r~oposea to be s~i~d by an on-sitei ~'~'~ system. The development permit has been drafted-i~to~¥~flect the:d~kfi.'-¢omprehensik~',)~lans policy statement requiring commercial developments"t°'..~o ~n~.~ect ~0 '~rban-:s~s-.'When available, in the event that the comprehensive plan is adopted.-" :: ~TI?'¢ Landscaping Plan meets City standards. The Planning Commission .,~;~..i?~[e~ed the site pI'an;:'on June 5, 2001. The Planning Commission recommended site plan . .'!:~ !_'.~ ..... 'appr09a~:eontingent up~Sn~ompt:{ -ance with City Staff Review Letter dated May 25, 2001, revised ~-'-:'-' ~;:'"' June 19,200~:,.. ~ ~-'- Motion by coUncilmemb~r Kurak, seconded by Mayor Gamec, to approve the proposed site plan ~ -:;:.. for a multi-tenaflt':office building contingent upon compliance with City staff review letter dated '~-4 .-:- May 25, 2001, i~,vised June 19, 2001. - _,. .~,.:. - --Motion cardedl Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Kurak, Anderson, Hendriksen, · andZimmerman. Voting No: None. -66-