Agenda - Council - 08/14/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Case #8: Request to Rezone Property from B-1 Business and R-1 Single Residential to Planned Unit Development; Case of Royal Oaks Re: Case #9: Request for Preliminary Plat (PUD Site Plan) of The Ponds; pal Oaks Realty Request for Site Plan Review for Townhomes Subdivision; Case of Royal Oaks Realty, Inc. Case #10: The Case #11: Request to Appeal Board of Adjustments *~ a Variance to Height Restrictions for a Senior Case of Royal Oaks Realty, Inc. Case #l 2: Request for Site Plan Review for within The Ponds Subdivision; Case of Roya! Oaks Principal Planner Trudgeon stated that Royal. Oaks Realty has to rezone property located at the southwest comer of CSAH 5 (Nowthen Street from B-1 Business and R-1 Singt to Planned Unit (P.U.D.). The rezoning would allow the for 73 sin 152 townhome units and 82 apartment units. ~:'~'~" is the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The ' application proposes to develop 73 single family homes on th~ ~of ~erty, 152 townhomes along Nowthen Blvd., and a 82 unit apartment )r ens along Dysprosium St. The current Comprehengi'~:Plan identifies this ,~ commercial and single family development. The March 200ii,~a~t'C3~Prehensive Plan'~'~ows this area as being High Density Residential along Dyspr~gi~ St., Medifi,rn Density Re~g~ long Nowthen Blvd. and Low Density Residenti.'al",)°~ the westem?~rt of the prop :":The development property is adjacent to prop~rt~')tha~:is zoned R-~i~:irigle Family R~ al, with the exception of a parcel north of the devel~l~me~' ~r°perty th~!:,ii§: ~'edT:R~3 ~" Residential, and a portion of the Flintwood Hills P.U.D. that is '~C~j'i/cmi~b::'th~';~'~:i¢~ion of the development property. The Lord of Life ~,,~,C ~hcr~ ~,Ch property i:~!.i0n the northeast side of Nowthen Blvd. is zoned B-l, Business and the ,,~i¢~;.i¢S~v'anhah. Oaks Seni~i:~partment Building on the eastern side of Dysprosium is zoned MR Residenti~[(?i~A:j,:~or Comprehensive Plan amendment may be required if the March 200*l::Draft Compr~fi~n~)e Plan is not adopted by City Council by the time their proposal has complet~'~l necess~:4~views. The landscape plan meets the 20%. open space requirement fora Planned uni~ Development. City staff has reviewed the landscaping plan as part of the site plan review pmc~'ss. The initial landscaping plan was deficient. The developer is working on a d;~ : · · · · new landscapmg plan to meet the Cxty standards. The Plannmg Comm~ssmn held a pubhc "?'!ii: :!.i ihearing in red'ds to the proposed rezoning on June 5, 2001. After review of the application, the '~'~:~!~h!mingCgmmission recommended that the rezoning application submitted by Royal Oaks R~:~,b~.',fi~Pproved by the City Council. City Staff and the Planning Commission recommended app~4~i of the request for rezoning of the property from B-1 Business and R-1 Single Family P~eSidential to Planned Unit Development. I City Council/June 26, 2001 i Page 13 of 27 -67-