My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/28/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 08/28/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:26:55 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 2:30:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/28/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
472
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />,I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />as the dual properties that are residential commercial and come up with something that would <br />buffer those neighborhoods. The property west of Armstrong Boulevard should be designated as <br />mixed use to include the rail station and then layer that area with high, and medium density <br />residential. <br /> <br />Mr. Bachan replied that it has already been made clear that all five Councilmembers will not <br />agree to that option. He inquired if there were any other options. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired as to what the importance was of the mixed-use <br />designation. He questioned why it was so important to have residential in the location of <br />Ramsey Boulevard and Armstrong Boulevard. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson stated that there are some Councilmembers that believe that mixed use <br />provides a good net tax base. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec suggested placing townhomes along Northfork golf course and then place <br />industrial in the location of the loop of the bridge: <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen noted that he could agree with townhomes being located in the area <br />of Northfork. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson stated that the main issue of debate seems to center around Section 28. <br />She inquired as to what portion of section 28 could be mixed use. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen replied that it depends on how they define mixed use. <br /> <br />Councilmember Amderson stated that she believes that the rail station should be combined with <br />mixed use. <br /> <br />Mr. Bachan inquired as to what the Council thinks off'hen they say mixed use. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen replied that he sees mixed use as retail, commercial, <br />business/warehouse and some residential. He does not see heavy industrial. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman inquired as to how much commercial can the City support with <br />Riverdale down the road. -- <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec replied that the area will not be a large shopping center. It will be a "catch all" <br />area. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak stated that she anticipates office buildings, doctor offices, and some <br />shopping on the site. <br /> <br />City Council/July 26, 2001 <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br /> <br />-85- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.