Laserfiche WebLink
-20- <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Kociscak, Reeve, and Watson. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Johnson and Sweet. <br /> <br />COMMISSION BUSINESS <br /> <br /> Case #1: Request for a Sketch Plan Approval of McDonald 2nd Addition; Case of <br /> Robert McDonald <br /> <br />Presentation '~. ~-- <br /> <br />Community Development Assistant Wald stated that the City:_received an application from <br />Robert McDonald requesting sketch plan approval to create two,, new lots from an exisfiqg 38- <br />acre homestead and a 5-acre homestead located at 16641 variolite Street and 16591 'V%iolite <br />Street. Mr. McDonald cmzently owns 38.22 acres and Mr: Makowsky,~wns 5.38-acres (;f61: a <br />total of 43.60 acres) and they would like to subdivide-their parcels to cf.:cate two more lots that <br />will consist of 2.88 acres and 3 acres. The minor subdi'visi:on is in-c°nformance with 4 units in <br />40 acres density restrictions. The newly created and existing ~i0ks!~eet the 200 feet of frontage <br />on a public road requirement. The subject property is located Within the Rural Transition Area <br />'and is subject to a minimum 2.5 acre lot sizere~triction; the newly.created and existing lots meet <br />this requirement. Following prewous and currenfpraCtice to limit thenumber of accesses off of <br />Variolite Street, staff is recommending that 'the two heWly.'created lot-~ provide a shared access <br />onto Variolite Street. Staff is also recommending that the dfi:veways for the newly created lots <br />be alimaed on the tots to allow for future subd~,visioh~and ultimately access be derived from an <br />interior road and access be eliminated from Vari0]ite Street. The plat is retaining a 66-foot <br />drainage and utility easement through the plat-~'-.:an east/west direction. The easement is <br />intended to preserve a ~orridor for a futmre road that. is designated in the comprehensive plan to <br />facilitate the future extension of 16?~h,'~J~venue to .~'~a'mstrong Blvd City Staff recommends <br />approval of the sketch pian. ' '-.~' ...... ~ .:'~ _-_~_.~: ~::~....~ <br /> <br /> Community De_-_v.-elopment"Assistant Wald noted the McDonalds could not be present at this <br /> meetlng,~however Mr. Makowsky is_ present. He expressed he had no issues with the plans thus <br /> <br /> Commission Business <br /> <br /> Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commissioner Reeve, to recommend that City <br /> Council apprgve.the sketch plan for McDonald 2nd Addition contingent upon compliance with <br /> City Staff Review Letter dated August 31,2001. <br /> <br /> Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Reeve, Kociscak, and Watson. <br /> Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Johnson and Sweet. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS/COMMISSION BUSINESS <br /> <br />Planning Commission/September 10~ 2001 <br /> Page 2 of 24 <br /> <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br /> <br /> <br />