Agenda - Council - 09/25/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I I I I I :1 I I I I I I Motion by Commissioner Kociscak, seconded by Commissioner Reeve, to recommend that the City Council deny Mr. WoWs request for a conditional use permit to exceed the accessory structure square footage restrictions established in City Code based on the Findings of Fact with variables favorable to the den/al. Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Commissioners Kociscak, Reeve, and Chairperson Nixt. Absent: Commissioners Johnson and Sweet. Voting No: Case #5: Request to Rezone Certain Property from R-1 Urban Residential; Case of Jacob Barthold'ii!'ii~'d Development, Inc ~ · Chairperson Nixt closed the regular, portion of the Pla~ngC~mission meethg .at order to call the public heating to order. to R-1 Land in Public Hearing Chairperson Nixt called the public hearing to.,.order at 8'15 Presentation .. i~:,'~"~':i;:':~?iiii? ?:~: .... Community Development Director Frolik stat'~a ~hat t~;~::Ci~ ~e~¢d an application from Jacob and Therese Ba~hold and O~woo~ Land Degdopment requesting a rezomng of prope~ in Section 14 from R-1 Rural' Residenfi~ to R-1 ~ Residential to pe~it development of the subject prope~y with single family residential lots~:~ed by sa~t~ sewer ~d mu~cipal water. ~e prope~y is approximately 9.7 a~'in size. ~. B~hold s request, the subject prope~ was pa~ of a Com~ehensive Pl~'h~mament, i¢~d in 1993 by the Ci~ of Ramsey for a MUSA bounda~ ex~ion. B~ ~h~::;t/m~:~h~:~'hdment was approved by Metro Council in 1995, a po~,~.pg.,0f Mr. Ba~Old"s prope~, which is the subject of today's request, was not inctuded in' fl~e. ~S.A bound~,.expansion e~ibit. ~e fact ~at t~s potion of ~. Ba~hold's prop~is not in '~he' MUSA came, to light dudng the prelimina~ plat review of Apple ~dge (ensuin~ phases nameg; ~ver P~es).~ 1997. ~e preliminau plat was modified to eliminate rgi.s, po~ion of Mr. Ba~hol~'s prope~. ~erefore, the cu~ent Comprehensive Plan reta~s tbs proP~y,tbr single family'residential uses ar ~ral stand,ds. If the Ci~ is ~clined to ~ant the rezoning,, k would have to,be conditioned upon an amendment to the cu~ent Comprehensive Plan to rinelude the subj;~ct prope~y in the ~SA bounds. ~e March 2001 Draft comprehensive Plan proposes to include the subject prope~ in the next ~SA expansion. City Staff recommends' approval of the rezomng. Citizen Input John Peterson of Oakwood Land Development, Inc. stated that there is a lot orb/story on this parcel. His firm is interested in finishing the Apple Ridge/River Pines development. He Planning Commission/September 10, 2001 Page 9 of 24 -259-