My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/25/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 09/25/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:27:51 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 2:57:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/25/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
369
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairperson Nixt pointed out the current Comprehensive Plan permits this area to be developed <br />as proposed. <br /> <br />Ms. Landwehr asked how much time the developers are allowed to put the houses in. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Kociscak inquired what size lot Ms. Landwehr had. <br /> <br /> Ms. Landwehr stated she has five acres. She added that she is opposed to the ~. <br /> <br /> Chairperson Nixt stated he is adjacent to River Pines, on the other side7 didn't <br /> necessarily &sagree w~th her, but smd tt was never his understanding:tlid~the ek'~[~i~n of the <br /> remmnder of Mr. Barthold s property from the MUSA would be a. permanent s~tua~ion?~.. <br /> <br /> Motion by Commissioner rociscak, seconded by Comm~ner Nixt, to close t~e.i'¢hblic <br /> <br />Mobon Came& orang Yes: Chmcerson Nlxt, Co~asmners Scak, Reeve, and Watson. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Co~ss~oners;~.J~son and S~eeti::~:~? <br /> <br />The public hearing closed at 8:35 p.m. ~/?:;77%x:,,,~ <br />Commission Business 'Cd, ;~,.. ~;~¢:?< ;. - ' ,--~ t~,~:. ~ <br /> <br />Chaicerson Nixt called the reg~ meeting of~e-Pla~ng Co~ission back to order at 8:35 <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson offered t0 respond to so.~:.¢ of the con~ raised. In regard to the question on the <br />time ~ame, Mr. Peterson noted th~e,~6-!30~plus, l'¢~ m the Apple ~dge development. It is <br />not uncommon to ab~0f¢ :30 hod~ ~::~*~;..'~,~ as the case, Apple mdge/mver Pines <br />would be a 4 year prQect;. He said he hoped he didn't represent that it wouldgo hster. <br /> <br />Chai¢~sofi ~t k0~ented"~e:'~n't sure Mr. Peterson did imply the time ~me would be <br />quick~," {hough he saiS hewas s~ at the time ~me as well. <br /> <br />Mr: Peterson explained if'~s prQect was approved t~s winter, it would be constructed next <br />sphng,, w[~ building pe~its:' obtained in the su~er. <br /> <br /> ~at.th~ access to the no~h would be more of a dead end. He explained ~at <br />Mr. <br /> Peterson <br /> stated <br />it <br /> would <br /> not pmhdetthe ultimate access to Mr. Miller's prope~y; there would still be a plot of <br />land in between ~br Pines 5~ and ~. Miller's prope~y. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt commented that the developer is ready to work with City Staff and if the <br />neighbors and Mr. Miller is amenable, both objectives can be accommodated. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/September 10, 2001 <br /> Page 11 of 24 <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.