Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Watson inquired how many units are being proposed. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon responded there are 204 on the Concept Plan. The gross density <br />would be 8.39 units per acre. Medium density is defined as up to 7 units. He guessed there <br />would be a net density of 10 to 11 units per acre. The neighbors across the road are mostly <br />residential and some commercial. The neighbors have not expressed opposition to this <br />development. <br /> <br />Commissioner Watson questioned whether the access would be from T.H. <br /> <br />153d Avenue. <br /> <br />Mr. Eby responded the access would be to 153rd Avenue. <br /> <br /> ........ ~r. ,~ e, . <br />Motmn by Commissioner Koc~scak, seconded by Commlss~,.n~}~eeve, to City <br />Council adopt the Findings of Fact, favorable to the appliq lating to a request to llhe <br />subject property from R-iR Residential, B-1 Business, andlg~:~2 Business~!~ Multiple 1~ :tihl. <br /> <br /> ...... ~ ~}~:~' . <br />Motion Camed. Voting Yes: Co~lss~oners Kocxsmk~;}~iRe~y%~;and Watson. Vobng No: <br />Chai~erson Nixt. Absent: Co~issioners JoMson and S~ <br /> <br />Chai,erson Nixt explained he was oppos~:Jbf~n!e, ~e understod ::i~tent for that ~ea was <br />for commercial development %?:'% <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Koclscak, seconded~,~y;~Co~!ss~o~[0eve, to reco~end that C1W <br />Council approve the request ~p~.mzone the subj~:P,[op~ Eom R-1R Residential, B-1 Business, <br />and B-2 Business to Multipl~TRs:sldgntial, based :;~;'ifi; findings of hcts. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. VOtiVe' Yes: Co~issioners ~5~scak, Reeve, and Watson. Voting No: <br />Chai~erson Nixt. AbSent: Co~:~Si~n~s:to~son?~d Sweet. <br /> <br />Case ¢13: Request for a'C6mprehensive Pla~ Amendment; Case of Ed~a Development, <br /> <br />PreSentation ",.:,:.': ;;; ?~,, ' ?:.; ,.~ <br /> <br />PffnciPal Planner Tmdgeon; Stated that the City received an application ~om Edina Development, <br />Inc. for'a comprehensive pl:~ amendment to change the land use desi~ation for prope~ they <br />would like {~ develop ~°m::~ommercial and single family residential to Mgh densi~ residential. <br />The comprehensive pl~' ~mendment, coupled with their rezo~ng request, would allow the <br />applicant to construct a tow~ouse development. <br /> <br />Commission Business <br /> <br />Planning Commission/September 10, 2001 <br /> Page 23 of 24 <br /> <br />-41- <br /> <br /> <br />