Laserfiche WebLink
development they will know exactly what they get. The Planning Commission <br />eliminate the through street of Ute Street. Mr. Westrum felt that the Council should <br />Waco Street as well as 155th Lane, with an emergency access being placed at 155th <br />would not cause any safety concerns. <br /> <br />John Hatch, 155ti' Lane, Ramsey, stated that if the northern accesses are it will <br />more traffic to 155th <br /> Lane. <br /> <br />Eric Ness, 15390 Ute Street, Ramsey, stated that he moved to Ra~~su~r and was told <br />that Ute street would not be a t~ough street. He requested::ffi~ the ~ouncfl st~ck w~ the <br />Pla~ing Commission's decision to remove the Ute Str&t c~;tion so fhat they can maintain <br />their exmt~ng neighborhood. ~.:~-.:~;::;~ <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendfiksen inquired if Mr. Ness felt ~a~f::~ere transitioning <br />between his lot and the new lots. <br /> <br />Mr. Ness replied that he is only trying to make the best of a situatii <br /> <br />did not::~ow existed. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Hendriksen inquiyed;i/ifi:,i:~,;:...Ness felt that provided to <br /> residents at $1.00 per square foot.. :Q'i~ i':i,i~. <br /> <br /> Mr. Ness replied no. ':;;;'~ <br /> <br /> Councilmember Hendfiksen lnqmred ~f ~::':NesS. felt that th~.~nsitioning should be provided <br /> for free. .- -~-?: . <br /> <br /> .~.., <br /> Mr. Ness replied,that he was not sure. <br /> .5,~:: <br /> <br /> Director 0f Public Works/Fi~e'~hief Kapler re~'~d that he has been following the changes made <br /> to the development and:'~hen he.sees a pi~;:~'Mth all cul-de-sacs to the no~h he ~ts quit~ <br /> concerned. H~ ~tated.~at:as the C~:;~i~6'~please the'residents they lose track of the what <br /> circumstances. <br /> <br />Cit~ A~omey Goodfigh-S~ated tfiat he Wanted to comment on the issue of due process that was <br />commented on by a resident.' He explained that he had reviewed the public hemng notice that <br />was sent out: to~ the residents; which included an aRac~ent of the ofig~al proposal, option C. <br />As a result of'the public heating a different option was selected and that is a co~on place thing <br />that plans change, but on the other hand it may be unfo~nate that a plat was sent out with the <br />public heating:notice because some residents could have assumed that that would have been the <br />. actual version. Of what was adopted. He stated that the Council might want to consider another <br />public he~g noting in the public heating notice that the plat might change. <br /> <br />City Council/August 28, 2001 <br /> Page 13 of 35 <br /> <br />-63- <br /> <br /> <br />