Laserfiche WebLink
-24- <br /> <br /> that he was in favor of all roads in the development being cul-de-sac except for the accesses:fr°m <br /> 153rd Avenue, but currently there are no kids that play at the park on 155th Lane and'cul-de~ <br /> sacing 155th Lane would drive more traffic to Yakima Street. ~--:' :':~'~ <br /> <br /> John Lichter, 15665 Juniper Ridge Drive, Ramsey, stated that he saw veu tli~tl'e measures of <br /> density transitioning being proposed in the development. He stated that he,WOUld like to find out <br /> what the City intends to do in regards to density transitioning. He also noted' that he did n0tsee <br /> any information regarding storm water retention. Think some cul-de, sacs are., necessary in <br /> development, but in regards to street assessments their streets were recently redone and assessed <br /> for and know they will be pushing more traffic onto those streetS~ Maybe'~he City should refund <br /> some of the money. In regards to density transitioning he would' like to know what the Council <br /> intends to do in this case. <br /> <br /> Cary Manuel, 15668 Juniper Ridge, Ramsey, stated <br />property the land was platted with one acre lots. It has a long-history and they are at a point of <br />resolving the issue. The residents that border the development',to the north have agreed to buy <br />some land and not continue with lawsuits. Know they are requesting'that there be some cul-de- <br />sacs on the north side of the developmen, t to prevent additional traffic :in:their neighborhood He <br />expressed that traffic should be directed to 153ra where the City has spent a lot of money for a <br />new stop light. Apple Ridge only has One access :from the development so the City has allowed <br />it in the past and should be consistent. It is time'at they find some resolution and move <br />forward. <br /> <br />Don Hatch, 15500 Barium Street, Ramsey, stated .that he haS-been a resident of Ramsey since <br />1975. He explained that one of the reasons he moved out to Ramsey was because of the space. <br />He stated that several-of.the Councilmembers ran on density transitioning and Councilmember <br />Hendriksen asked the Council to stand forward and-give the residents density transitioning. He <br />reviewed some of the different layout option~ i:'expressing that there is no real purpose for the <br />155th Lane connection. If there is an increase in ;volume of traffic they will have to pay for the <br />additional wear and tear on the roads. Hestated that he would have to be in favor of Option B, <br />which shows 40 cars accessing 't 55a' I~ane. ' <br /> <br />'Ross Dehn, 5251 156''~ :Lane, Ramsey, stated that there is already enough traffic along 156th Lane. <br /> '- <br />He stated that he would like to see 155th Lane cul-de-saced with maybe an emergency access. <br />There are numerous little children in the neighborhood and very concerned with their safety. He <br />was in favor':of having two streets on the north be cul-de-sacs. Mr. Dehn inquired as to what the <br />park expansion will include, because the existing playground equipment is in tough shape. <br /> <br />Marty ?, 15235 Zunie Street, Ramsey, stated that he moved to Ramsey for the quietness. He <br />stated that with~the development there will be more traffic and more problems and would like to <br />see the lots b'e: one acre lots. <br /> <br />George Pomeroy, 5430 155~h Lane, Ramsey, stated that he received no notices of the <br />development and lives on 155~h Lane. If the 155'h Lane is put though they will have an enormous <br /> <br />City. Council/September 11, 2001 <br /> Page 6 of 22 <br /> <br /> <br />