My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/09/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 10/09/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:28:13 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 3:10:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/09/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />amount of traffic, which is not what they need. He felt that improving the park <br />benefit, but 155~ Lane should be a cul-de-sac. The City needs to keep things safe for <br />that are already there. <br /> <br />Mr. Smith stated that speeding on 156th Lane is already bad and it will only <br />new development. <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />Mr. Nelson noted that Ute Street is the only street that is truly a cul-d~sac <br /> <br />barrica( <br /> <br />Mr. Barrett stated that his children do use the park along 1 <br />hopes that does happen. At a previous meeting it was <br />were offered to buy a buffer zone and the other residents <br />issue so why are they here know. He [ do! <br />zone and he has done what he can to make a 1: <br />was about certain development and he did not have the <br /> <br /> there"previously to discuss the <br />have the '*~'-,to purchase a buffer <br /> coalition <br /> coalition, but he <br /> <br />does not think that negates their concerns. The property north have a different <br />focus than the other areas because most are retired and don't have' n. <br /> <br />Pat Corkle, SRF Consultants, rev~e,w, ed ,the:traffic analys~s which mcl0deG::;~he location of the <br />development and the emst~ng coiiditions '~'of:;the':streets which are a ently operating at <br />acceptable levels of service, z;:.? '~' ~'~, ~ ~¢~:::~:.~.~'~ :~ <br /> <br />Councilmember Zi~e~an inquired as':te ~hat the'~shold ~f6r a road before a road needs <br />Mr. Corkle repIi~ that on a'residential road ~h~ would not w~t to see more ~an 1,000 trips per <br /> <br /> i qui d to ompletea. <br />C~ty Engineer Olson r~Hed June'2OO/L: <br /> <br />~. M~uel replied that the larger ~affic p~od is the ~ne months that c~ldren are in school· <br />~e'~felt,~m the ~affic 'mdy w6~ be si~fic~tly different if it were done duhng the school <br />year· ~ ~'~ <br /> <br />City Engineer'Olson noted' that there is a traffic mont~y 5ctor that is used when completing the <br />studies. <br /> <br />Mr. Corkle reviewed the estimated traffic counts from the new development noting that ail <br />intersections' ~ill operate at an acceptable level. <br /> <br />Mr.,Barrett requested comment on the impact of closing off 155th Lane. <br /> <br />City Council/September 11, 2001 <br /> Page 7 of 22 <br /> <br />-25- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.