My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/23/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 10/23/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:28:55 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 3:22:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/23/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
would like to work ~vith Lord of Life Church and noted the church offered to keep in toucl4'with <br />the pro~ession of the construction. He said he was concerned with the timetable of planting <br />trees and wants to make sure that doesn't get lost in the plansr <br /> <br />Commissioner Kociscak asked Mr. Hanson if he was happy the road was moved:ba~k_ 40-feet.. <br /> <br />Mr. Hanson responded his first choice would have been to have the r0ad~ ,:go to T.H. <br />Sunwood. Since that won't happen he felt the church did the best, they c°ul~. He noted the!:_ <br />church would have rather had the road go to T.H. 47 as well. '~ -'~ <br /> <br />Commissioner Watson pointed out when the property to th~inorth gets developed and the road <br />goes through, then a lot of the traffic will be alleviated. ....... "- ' . ~- ._ <br /> <br /> Commiss ion Business '-.:'7": :'~:`: .., ~ 4 ~-- <br /> <br /> Motion by Commxssioner Sweet, seconded by Commissioner Jonson, that City Council grant <br /> site plan approval to the apartment building to be located on the Lord of Life Church property <br /> contingent upon compliance with the City. Staff review letter dated August .~..; 200~, revised <br /> September 28, 2001, the property being rezoned and receiving a minor Comprehensive plan <br /> amendment and the applicant receiving a variance'to the height restrictions: ' <br /> -.::.. -...f ': ,, <br /> Motion Carried, Voting Yes: 'ChairperSon Nixt, commissioners Sweet, Johnson, Kociscak, <br /> Reeve, and Watson. VotingNo: None. . :.: <br /> <br /> PUBLIC HEARING/COMMISSION BUS,ESS <br /> <br /> Case #3: Re~luest for a Conditional Use-Permit to Exceed Accessory Building Height; <br /> : : Case of JeffWelte <br /> <br /> Chairperson Nixt. close4the regular portion-o~ the Planning Commission meeting at 8' 10 p.m. in <br /> order ro call the public, hearing to, Order: '".. -~'' <br /> <br />-~'Pfiblie Hearing ', - ~ <br /> <br /> Chairperson Nixt called thepubI~c hearing to order at 8:10 p.m. <br /> <br /> Presentation <br /> <br /> Principal Plann~i: Trudgeon stated the City received an application from Jeff Welle for a <br /> conditional use permit to exceed the detached accessory building height resmctions established <br /> m~-City C0d~ on the property located at 15351 Ute St. NW. The subject property ~s <br /> approximately 2.5 acres in sxze and is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area <br /> (MUSA). Ci~ Code restricts detached accessory buildings to sixteen (16) feet in height if the <br /> property is located within the MUSA area. The applicant is requesting to construct a detached <br /> <br />-t 74- <br /> <br />Planning Commission/October 4, 2001 <br /> Page 8 of 18 <br /> <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.