Laserfiche WebLink
Citizen Input <br /> <br /> Motion by Commissioner Jo~on, S~nded by C~~n~:?Sweet, to close ~e public <br /> hearing. ' <br /> <br /> Motion Ca~ed. Vomgyes: Chaimersd~'~i,X~, Co~sS{~ners Jonson, Sweet, Kocisc~, <br /> Reeve, and Wats6n.~' Votiag,No: None. <br /> ;. '~ ::. <br /> <br /> ~e public hearing closed at~8:fl2 p.m. <br /> <br /> Com'~gSion:Business . :' :;'~:: :,,,,,..: <br /> <br /> Chai,erson Ni~{:.~ed~ the re~lar m~{i~g of the Pl~ng Co~ission back to order at 8:12 <br /> <br /> Motion by' .Co~issioner'J0~Son, seconded by Chaicerson Nixt, to reco~end ~at CiW <br /> Councd adopt: find~ngs.,o~},hct hvorable to apphcant relating to Jeff Welles request for a <br /> conditional us~ ~emit to '~ceed the accessow building height restriction. <br /> <br /> Further discuss}~'~: Commissioner Sweet stated she was opposed. She explained that she felt if <br /> .roles were in' PI~ce, they should be followed. Principal Plier Tmd~eon noted tNs prope~ is <br />'~.Within the..MUSA, so the height restriction is ~ 6 feet. If tNs was outside the MUSA, the height <br /> restriction .then would be 27 feet and this is 25 feet. Chai~erSon Nixt stated he would approve <br /> thiSrequest since the prope~y already has height N the house. TNs is an aesthetic consideration. <br /> <br />accessory building that would be 27 feet in height, which results in an l 1-foot deviatio,~:';;m,. <br />City Code. The applicant would like to exceed the 16-foot height restriction in order <br />a detached accessory building that closely matches the height of the existing resider~c~ Under <br />City Code, a 2,5 acre parcel can have up to 2,0,6,4,,s. quare feet of accessory buil~i!~ace. The <br />proposed building will be 1,080 square foot (30 x_~6') in size· Coupled with ~ :garage <br />(980 sq. ft.), the applicant will have 2,060 sq. ft. in accessory buildings. ~e, the ~'~!~Cant <br />will not exceed the maximum allowable square footage for accessory b s..The acc~'~.~ <br />building will closely match the height of the existing attached garag~i ,The' ::~ant has sta <br />that the detached accessory bmldmg wall be utzhzed for personal s~a:ge~?He pofiited out that the <br />plans call for a window near the top and assured the applicant ~:~t Cannot be used for a <br />reszdence nor business. The proposed detached access{ ~hng wzll 1Se located zn the rear <br />yard approximately 60' north of the principal d .e pro_p~ed accessory building <br />location exceeds the six (6) foot side yard and five yard ~ s established in the <br />residential urban area. The Applicant is proposing ~:~ building. <br />Staff is recommending approval of JeffWelle's request for zse permit to exceed the <br />accessory building height restriction established in City Code· <br /> <br />Planning Commission/October 4, 2001 <br /> Page 9 of 18 <br /> <br />-175- <br /> <br /> <br />