My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/23/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 10/23/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:28:55 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 3:22:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/23/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairperson Nixt commented that on the Rural Preserve Area, he is somewhat sympatheti¢'iiS':~e: <br />landowners there. He noted that the City, has heard from the landowners. The <br />preserve the Rural Area. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kociscak asked where the Mississippi River bridge would <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon showed on the map where the bridue woul , He <br />would connect to Dayton. He noted the construction of the bridge w~}~e a lot~gSip[ocess ............. <br /> <br />Chm erson N~xt uest~oned xvhat the concept w~ of the CenW~;~ ~ea <br /> <br />Principal Pla~er Tmdgeon explained the 4 in 40 desi~[0~"would rmain N effect. With ~e <br />possibiliW of having urban semices up there, ~e ci~ ..... study it ~:~te~ine ~e fe~ibili~ <br />of redevelopment. %e od~nal Ntent was ~ untouched. <br />Development is ~owing to the west along ~e High~y 10 it i'g~hot being pursued <br />to ~e no~h. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt mentioned the Council is considering additional <br />suggested tt be left m the Council s <br /> <br />Motion by Chaicerson Nixt, .s~fid~ by ComissiSfi~r::IoMson, to <br />Council consider ~e public he~ng c°~ents ~d <br />the proposed Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />issue and <br /> <br /> that the City <br />this meeting in regard to <br /> <br /> Motion Carried. ,~ .;Voting,Yes: Commissibners Johnson, Kociscak, Reeve, <br /> Sweet, and Wats0n-':.Votingi!No: None. <br /> <br /> Case #2: , .i'::;¥,'Request for a Site Plan an Apartment Building Located on the <br /> ,~,,'?'"'?:)';" ...? ..~ ,.. Lord of Life~roperty;,. :.:,:, Case o~'L0i'd of Life Church <br /> <br /> ~ · ::i"Ph~iifiipal Planner T~d~eon noted that a letter on this issue has been handed out at this meeting. He <br /> .,,~. i i:': '""'i{~i~ 5th~:"Lord of Life :Church, ~ applied for site plan review for an apartment building to be <br /> located oii. their property. "~fi, i applicant is planning on constructing a 47-apartment unit building <br /> designed for:Senior citizens~.'i:~e apm~unent building will be located on the northeast comer of their <br /> property near S~te Highwa~;~7. 'The applicant has submitted an application for the rezoning of the <br /> development pgopcrty from B-1 Business and R-3U Residential to ~ Multiple Residential. The <br /> rezoning, along'i~'ith a minor Comprehensiye Amendment, will permit a 47-unit apartment to be <br />I ":15"~i:i:"}:::'i!':':. constructed. T2i;~ apartment building will be constructed in an area that is roughly 10.05 acres in <br />· <br /> '::5:.';:size. At this: fii~e, the applicant is proposing to construct only one of the two proposed buildings. <br /> 'Thei:gross '.denSity of the parcel will be 9.35 units per acre when both buildings are constructed. <br />I onfie wetlands are factored out, the net density will be 12.29 units acre when both buildings are <br /> per <br /> cons~cted. The March 2001 Draft Comprehensive Plan indicates the apartment building location is <br /> pl'mmed for high density housing at a net density up to 15 units per acre. The apartment building <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Planning Commission/October 4, 2001 <br /> Page 5 of 18 <br /> <br />-287- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.