My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/23/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 10/23/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:28:55 PM
Creation date
9/4/2003 3:22:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/23/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
would like to work with Lord of Life Church and noted the church offered to keep in touch .~with <br />the pro~ession of the construction. He said he was concerned with the timetable o.f planting <br />trees and wants to make sure that doesn't get lost in the plans. <br /> <br />Commissmner Kociscak asked Mr. Hanson if he was happy the road was movedlbadk 40 'feet. <br /> <br />Mr. Hanson responded his first choice would have been to have the roag. tgo to T.H. <br />Sunwood. Since that won't happen he felt the church did the best they c0Ul'& He noted <br />church would have rather had the road go to T.H. 47 as well. ,.::"~": :~ <br /> <br />Commissioner Watson pointed out when the property to the n°rth gets de~,eloped and the road <br />goes through, then a lot of the traffic will be alleviated. '~ :' ~:;' <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Sweet, seconded by Commissioner Jotinson, that City, Council grant <br />site plan approval to the apartment building to be located on the Lord of Life Church property <br />contingent upon compliance with the City Staff review letter dated'~'Attgust3;[,~. 2001, revised <br />September 28, 200I, the property, being., rezoned and receiving a minor comprehensive plan <br />amendment and the applicant receiving a variance to.the height restrictions: . <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commisst0ners Sweet, Johnson, Kociscak, <br />Reeve, and Watson. Voting No: None. -,- .':.'-:' - <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING/COMMISSION BUS~NESS <br /> <br />Case #3: Request for;a Conditional Use~Permit to Exceed Accessory Building Height; <br /> <br />Chairperson. Nixt closec[ the i~egular portiorr-.0ftthe Planning Commission meeting at 8:10 p.m. in <br />order to call the public' hearing toorder~' ": i'" <br /> <br />ChairpersonNixt called the pubric hearing to order at 8:10 p.m. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon stated the City received an application from Jeff Welle for a <br />conditional me.permit to exceed the detached accessory building height restrictions established <br />re.City Code" on the property located at 15351 Ute St. NW. The subject property is <br />approximately 2.5 acres in size and is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area <br />(MUSA.). City Code restricts detached accessory buildings to sixteen (16) feet in height if the <br />propertY is located within the MUSA area. The applicant is requesting to construct a detached <br /> <br />-290- <br /> <br />Planning Commission/October 4, 2001 <br /> Page 8 of 18 <br /> <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />! <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />i <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.