Laserfiche WebLink
exceed the top of the building parapet. Blue Line Collision Center is allowed 93 <br />wall signage per their 40' x 15.5' building front. The Applicant currently exceeds <br />square footage restrictions by approximately 227 square feet and the property <br />non-conforming billboard sign. The Applicant is proposing 133.5 square feet <br />which results in a 40.5 square foot overage. The sign is also proposing to <br />restrictions by 3 feet. The increase in sign height would provide <br />equipment located on the roof of the building. Blue Line Collision <br />remove an existing legal non-conforming billboard sign located on <br />all existing wall signage. The Applicant would then like to <br />awning that would extend the length of the building front <br />building. The City has, in the past, granted conditional use <br />allowed under City Ordinances (Ampride, Burger King, Pl~a <br />and M & G Leasing Inc.). The Planning <br />conditional use permit request and conducting a <br />during the public hearing. The Planning Commission <br />applicant is reducing the total amount of signage on the <br />conforming signs. <br /> <br />;ignage; <br /> <br /> is proposi~ ~ <br /> · . ~:i~ '.~ <br /> ~ h~ building a <br /> m.;~he form of an <br /> one side of the <br /> l~ger s~s ~an <br /> Town Square <br /> 2001 to review the <br /> no citizen input <br /> approval because ~e <br />eli~ating some non- <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquire&~i~i~Yare proposing to <br /> <br />Co~umty Development D~rectOr Fr01~reched <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember seco~¢~by C imember Kur~, to adopt <br />Resolution ~01-09-~ adopting ~ ~ating to Blue Line Collision <br />Center's request fora conditional use <br /> <br />Motion ca~'ed~::~ Voting 'Ye~: Mayor s Zi~e~, Kurak, and <br />Andersom/VOting No: Com~lmmber <br /> <br />Kurak, and <br /> <br />· ~:..i Councilmcn-nber Kurak stated that at the September 20, 2001 meeting with the facilitator she had <br /> thought that' the Council had come to an agreement for the proposed central rural preserve area <br /> langUage~ She did make the changes requested by Councilmember Hendriksen and <br /> COu.nCilmember Zimmerman, which she reviewed. She stated that she had felt that the Council <br /> <br />Motion 'aarded Votin~!Y"~gk*:' Mayor Gmec, Councilmembers Zime~an, <br />Anderson. Vq~g No: G6'~t~i~mber Hendfiksen. <br /> <br />Case ~lOa: C~ntral Planning Area <br /> <br />City Council/September 25, 2001 <br /> Page 25 of 31 <br /> <br />,3O <br /> <br /> <br />