Agenda - Council - 10/23/2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I Mayor Gamec recessed the regular City Council meeting at 8:53 p.m. I Mayor Gamec called the regular City Council meeting back to order at 9:03 p.m. I I I' I '1 I I ! I I I Case #10: Request for Final Plat Approval of Smith Addition; Cas, Community Development Director Frolik stated that David final ptii?~';~¢;i~, approval of a minor subdivision to plat a 20-acre p~cel I/IA will~ accommodate the emst~ng homestead on the subject prope~ fo ~:~ Lot 2/2A w~ll be a new, bmldable lot. ~e prope~ ~s loc ted on the east s~dd}:~ ~g Boulevard, south of 156"' Avenue NW. ~e ~oss ~ea of the plat, ~ncludmg ~gtrong Boulevard and ~p~ne Drive right-of-way, zs 20 a~es. Two residential lots wJt~m~;;~ea are m c6~0~ce w~th the 4 ~n 40-density restriction. Both of the lots will have ~9¢'~e~g~d 200 fe~:;oi~;~ontage on public roads. Lot l/lA and Lot 2/2A comply with the 2.5 ~re m~i~:~}~i~e~:%~e potions of ~e . .... lots on the east szde of Alpine Drive are wetl~d and were encumbered w~th drmnage and ut~hw easements when the right-of-way for Alpine Drive was acquired~ se existing drainage ~d utility easements are confi~ed on the final plat. ~e Development ~:~e~,g:~eifies that lA and 2A are tied to one and ~o will be conSidered ~ ~s, not four; and I/IA will have one parcel identi 2/2A will have one~htification number. Lot I/lA is an existing homest~'~;'a~e lot l/lA will meet the required se~;k new resubdivision plan to show the cu~ent d¢¢~1o' prope~y to urban standards has been Staff recommended ~ that .~access on Lot 1 Drive and right ~i6~6~i~a!0pg Armstrong vicinity of the 'e:~iSting driveW~? on Lot 2. Councilinember Zimmerman~:stated that the county... i-'oad~ in a v~a~*~hat the structures on with City Code, a not o future development of the will access from Alpine Drive. from Armstrong Boulevard to Alpine be dedicated to the County except in the is trying to eliminate as many accesses onto Mr. David Smith,.i:15401 Armstrong evard NW, Ramsey, stated that they have their mail, ~:~: ?;':~d~!i~ered to them o'~i:~strong Boulevard and if they have to change their access onto Alpine c?! ?::z;"Dri~)'e"~tiey would have~0.'¢hang~ ~their mailing address. Councilme~be'k:.:Surak inqh ;a if Mr. Smith had a home based business. Mr. Smith repl~'~:yes. ' ,Councilmemb~'Kurak inquired if ~. Smith uses the access ~om ~sWong Boulev~d for hs :~:business. Mr.,:smith replied yes. CiW Council/October 9, 2001 Page 17 of 24 -63-