Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that Lot 2 should be able to use Alpine Drive without:~any <br />inconveniences., ~' .... ~ ~ I <br /> . ,-';,; <br />Mr. Smith replied that was correct, but they still would like to retain their existingdri~eway. <br /> <br />Councilmember Henddksen stated that he could foresee in the future someon'~'/W'anting t~-:bu~ild a <br />driveway for lot one on Armstrong Boulevard. /.. "~;:"~'~;~:,"~ii'~: .... .~:;~.,,.,,, I <br />Community Development Director Frolik replied that staff is req~ii~:;':that tl~'Would dedicate "?;'*~:, <br />right of access along Armstrong Boulevard except in the location6fthe bx/i¢Sng driveway. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired as to what the imp9~e was for'keeping the driveway in ~E::~'~ <br />its current location rather than moving it to the lot line,:; ?:;/ii~. <br /> _ '~ 9'. -,- L~, .~-~,v,:-:', .- <br /> <br />Mr. Smith replied that could be done. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak replied that permission would have to be g,¥en from Anoka County to <br />move the driveway. She inquired as tO. why the access on Armstron~ B,':oule..v,a~d Was necessary <br />for <br /> his <br /> business. <br /> <br />Mr. Smith replied because that i~ the iO~ation Of hiS. 3Verhead door of l:iiS'-::~utbuilding. It would <br />be very hard to go around the braise from his residence-entranCe!::.` <br /> '-7 i:. .:::. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Kurak, secon~ed'.byCoUncilmem'berAnderson, to adopt Resolution <br />#01-I0- granting final plat approval:to. !~mith Additior~' contingent upon entering into a <br />development agreement with the City, compt~iance with City staff review letter dated October 4, <br />2001 except_that the right of access along Armstrong Boulevard does not include the existing <br />driveway,and compliance With the recommend'*ati'~fi 6f the Park Commission. <br /> "'" '.- ,' <br />MotiSn' ~rried. Voting.-Yes: Mayor Gam~"';bouncilmembers Kurak, Anderson, Hendriksen, <br /> and Zimmerman. ¥gdng No :- None......:~ '::i-: <br /> <br />' Case #1I: - Report'frOm Economic Development Authority <br /> ; >;; _ -,_ , . <br /> <br /> The Economic Development Authority (EDA) met on Monday, August 20, 2001, and discussed <br /> the following cases: <br /> <br /> 1) Sunfish Commons Revolving Loan <br />· .. city Aciministrator Norman stated that the recently adopted Revolving Loan Fund, is <br />' :- ~ intended to fill the financing gap between project costs and private equity by making <br />'-- direct low-interest loans for certain approved business activities within the Ramsey City <br />.- > limits. The multi-tenant retail facility, known as Sunfish Commons, is located on <br /> <br />-64- <br /> <br />City Council/October 9, 2001 <br /> Page 18 of 24 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />