My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/09/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2003
>
Agenda - Council - 09/09/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 3:53:19 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 7:49:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/09/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
258
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
forward the Site Plan to the City, Council until revised plans have been submitted and review~<t <br />by Staff. ~ <br /> <br />Er/c Bladholm, representing L and D Properties, indicated they have had their engineer and <br />architect submit plans based on Staff s letter. They would still like to work with the City on how <br />the water drainage would work. He indicated the only other issue is paving the back section until <br />an addition is built. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer asked what the issue is with the drainage. <br /> <br />Mr. Bladholm indicated the first plan was not well thought out, and was put together quickly to <br />get on the agenda so the building can be up before winter. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johnson asked if the plan has been resubmitted but staff has not had a chance to <br />review it yet. <br /> <br />Assistant Co~rLmunity Development Director Trudgeon stated that was correct. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johnson asked about the paving issue. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler stated they require that maneuvering areas are paved. <br /> <br />Assistant C6mmunity Development Director TrUdgeon explained the petitioner is saying they do <br />not want to pave it because it could be future expansion area. <br /> <br />Mr. Bladholm stated it shows future expansion there, so for truck maneuvering they would have <br />to pave it, and then tear it up for the addition. He would like to work with staff so they can avoid <br />doing it twice. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johnson clarified they are only propoSing not paving the building expansion area. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon indicated Staff would stand by their <br />original recommendation. It will be used for maneuvering in the mean time, and they do not <br />know when an expansion will take place. He stated they could also hold' escrow for a certain <br />number of years and if no expansion is added, require paving at that time. However, he indicated <br />that is another thing that could fall through the cracks. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer stated he was not comfortable saying they have to do it in a few years if <br />they do not .expand, but he does not necessarily want them to have to tear up a lot of asphalt and <br />dump it, either. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johnson noted they need to remember what they do here has to apply elsewhere. <br /> <br />Mr. Bladholm stated the neighboring business has trucks backing off the street. If this was not <br />designated as a truck maneuvering area, they could back them off the street like the neighbors. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/August 7, 2003 <br /> Page 17 of 19 <br /> <br />-31- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.