Laserfiche WebLink
to determine what the requirements were when 177~ was replatted. That Agreement required the <br />Developer to replat 177th in its correct alignment and construct the road to Class 5 standards so <br />that each of the 3 lots would have 200 feet of road frontage. Lot 3, now owned by Mr. Kveton, <br />only has 100 feet of platted road frontage and it doesn't appear that the lot has 200 feet of Class 5 <br />improvements adjacent to it either. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />The Planning Commission has recommended adoption of findi, ngs of fact and approval of thc <br />request. Regarding the deficiencies in 177th discovered subsequent to the Plarming Commission <br />meeting, Scarf is of the orJ2~ion that requ~,ng the fulfillment o£ the full 200 feet of Class <br />improver-~ents adjacent to .*.',~ subject property will not resolve the tight turning radius at the <br />end. Therefore, StafFs reconwaendation is tiiat the propose4 conditional use pc:mit be amen-~-~' <br />to require ~:ne applicant to construct a Clas:; 5 '~emporary ct3~.;~.~-sac on his pro~,erty sufficier i: <br />size, accc~':';ng to the City Engineer, to accorr~nodate publL ao%ty and emer~,~'r,o~y vehicles. <br /> <br />Council A,.L'on: <br /> <br />Motion '~o adopt Resolut/~m #00-01- adopting Findi~zs of Fact # <br />Kveton'::, re?:est for a cor-'2i.~nal use pen ~2t ibr two dwelli, n~.~ on one parcel. <br /> <br />..... ~'elating to 3,Jr <br /> <br />Motion t- ~pprove Mr. ~5',,¢ :)n's request fo:: a conditional ~se i.~.~rmit basc~' ~n the finding:: <br />fact and ~ ;.opt Resolutio- #v0-01- dec! :,~ing terms of sa~,.e~ including h~e construction <br />Class 5 tc'7?orary cul-de~.~c. <br /> <br />~or- <br /> <br />Motion to ~ <br /> ~eny Mr. Kveton's request for a conditional use pe~it based on thc findings of fact. <br /> <br />Review Checklist: <br />City Administrator <br />City Engineer <br />City Attorney <br /> <br />CC: 01/25/00 <br /> <br /> <br />