Laserfiche WebLink
That the second dwelling requested will be a 1,008 square foot rambler with a 576 square <br />foot attached garage. <br /> <br />That the second dwelling on the 35 acre estate does not violate the 4 units in 40 acres <br />density restriction in the Rural Service Area. <br /> <br />10. <br /> <br />That the Applicant has stated an interest in developing the Subject Property as a personal <br />estate and is not interested in subdividing mad developing the property; therefore, the <br />Applicant api;lied for a conditional use permit rather than a subdivision in order to provide <br />separate living, quarters for the caretakers. <br /> <br />11. That there is a sufficient d! :mnce between tke Applicant':; dwelling and the caretaker <br /> dwelling to facilitate a subdivision that will m<;t structure seti,~ck requiremems. <br /> <br />12.. That the add!tJon of the secor 4 dwelling will ~ot adversely in:pact traffic in the re'ea. <br /> <br />~nat the second dwelling wM not be unduly dangerous or ot'b:?wise detrime~2~! to persons <br />residing or ',~'or!dng in the vicinity of the us~: ,,r to the public '.'..clfare. <br /> <br />That the second dwelling wii~ not substm~ti~!y adversely impak the use, cn:i:3yment, or <br />market valu~ of any surrounding property. <br /> <br />i5. That the second dwelling '~,ill not be ha:~dous or disturbing to exis75-~g or future <br /> neighborin~: uses. <br /> <br />16. That the second dwelling will be served adequately by public facilities and services such as <br /> highways and streets. <br /> <br />17. <br /> <br />That the second dwelling will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost <br />for public facilities and services, and it will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of <br />the commm'dty. <br /> <br />18. <br /> <br />That the second dwelling will not involve activities and uses that will be detrimental to any <br />persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, <br />smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br /> , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #97-05-130 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />