My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/25/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 01/25/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:38:10 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 9:33:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/25/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
304
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I Reply to: <br /> <br />W. M. Montgomery . <br />& Associates ....... --'-:':' - ...... <br /> <br />18321 Ridgewood Road · Minnetonka, MN 55345 · Telephone (612) 470-1099 <br />4921 Fifth Avenue South ~ Minneapolis, MN 55409-2644 · Telephone (612) 825-6399 <br /> <br />January 4, 20C9 <br /> <br />Ms. Megan Bar~c~ <br />City of Ramsey <br />Community Dew ~opment <br />15153 Nowthen Z.1vd. NW <br />Ramsey, MN 52~' 23 <br /> <br /> VIA FAX <br />g-12-427-5543 <br /> Page 1 of 1 <br /> <br />Re: Propo~c~ Construction of '~.,d West Wireless (5',,~::q'7) Communi~:$? .:z Monopole <br /> <br />Dear Ms. Barn¢: <br /> <br />At your request, -,e have undertaken review of the mak...,, ': which you furnis2e(~ pertaining to <br />the applicatioe, f "a 180' communica:' ~:~ monopole to be ._ .z~t~ at 17515 St. t~:~ ~cis Boulevard <br />NW. Based Ul:-,, our analysis we cc.~clude that: <br /> <br /> 1. There are no ct~er suitable existiv ~ :tructures _within % :?~ile of the propo:~-, location. <br />2. The site proi. ~ ::M by USWWis higher than many 0f..fl~?~tes ConstrUcted b): +~-~is applicant in <br /> the Twin Ci*:-:s metro area. The 5.~.sis for the' prol~:~t height of 180' 1: zrrnits USWW to <br /> provide conE.:;uous coverage with o~her sites already co?tructed or approved. ~ .*otc, however, <br /> the proposed site is dissimilar to othe;s established by thc applicant at lower t~zights in that sites <br /> with lower antennas are primarily i:~ing built closer to '2~e core of the servize area. <br />3. If the height cf the monopole is r~uced, it is unlikely that USWWwii1 be able to achieve their <br /> coverage objectives without adding additional, more closely spaced, sites. <br /> <br />Given more time, we would typically complete a more comprehensive analysis but in this instance <br />we are working against the deadline of the City Planning Commission Meeting. <br /> <br />Sincerely yours, <br />W.M. Montgomery & Associates <br /> <br />Communications Systems - Planning & Engineering <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.