Agenda - Council - 01/25/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

10. 11 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17, 18. 19. 20. 2I. That there is existing tree cover in the proposed location for the tower · That the Applicant has submitted support documents with the application consisting of the following: a) a written description of the proposal fi.om U.S. West to the City Zoning Administrator dated November 16, 1999; b) a color rendering of the monopole tower and equipment cabinets; c) a written description of the design criteria by Valmont Microflect dated August 25, 1998; d) a certificate of survey of the Site; e) site plan packet dated October 28, 1999, consisting of Sheet Z-t Title Sheet, Sheet Z-2 Vicinity Map, Sheet Z-3 SiZe Plan, Sheet Z-4 Enlarged Site Plan and Sheet Z-5 Elevation; f) aerial view of area. That Section 9.15.09 of '[he City Code restricts tower heights i~'~,~ Residential Districts to 75 ~(.et unless the Applicant can demonstrate to City Council that ':he additional incre.v, se in height is needed to accommodate a second uzer ~d the surroundip,.g topography, strut.rares, vegcta':ion and other factors make the height limit for a complying tower impractical. Th.~ ~he Applicant h:~; s+~ated that the tower ',,,'ill be designed !:o ¢.ecommodate a total of 4 ~se~'a and that there are no other structurez in the area at tl-: i~eight needed to provide sea_~less coverage. 'D?.t the Applicant has ot~.cted that access to the Site may be requi,ed 2 or 3 times a i'~r for mairt/.enance purposes ?A is proposed from an existing farm equii~ ~ent access on St. ir:antis Blvd. N.W. That the proposed usc will substantially impair the use or m,~rket value of sun'ounding prop:tries. That the proposed use is proposed to be located in the side yard of the existing residence; Section 9.15.03 of the City Code requires that towers be located in the rear yard o£residential parcels. That the proposed use will be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. That the proposed use will not involve equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. That in order to protect the health and welfare of the community, fencing and screening is necessary and is not provided for in the Applicant's proposal. RESOLUTION #00-01- Page 2 of 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I