Laserfiche WebLink
[I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> <br />CASE <br /> <br />REPORT FROM PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE <br /> By: Steve Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />The Public Works Committee met on March 21, 2000, and considered the following six cases: <br /> <br />Case #1: <br /> <br />Consider the Installation of a Street Light at the Intersection of 166th Avenue <br />and Jaspar Street <br /> <br />Mr. Ellis of 7001 166th Avenue was present requesting that the City install a priority street light <br />at the intersection of 166th Avenue and Jaspar Street as a measure to deter vandalism, which has <br />been occurring in the area. The existing policy states that priority street lighting locations shall <br />be limited to intersections at State, County and arterial City streets. City Engineer Jankowski <br />presented a map which indicates the streets that have been identified as being eligible for priority <br />lights. The common characteristic of these roads is that the typical speed traveled is 50 to 55 <br />mph. Jaspar Street is not one of the designated streets eligible for priority lights. <br /> <br />The Public Works Committee suggested that some provision be considered for allowing <br />flexibility in the policy in order to address locations that may be problem areas which could be <br />benefited by street lighting. The Committee recommended that a public hearing be held on this <br />issue and that a notice of the heating be sent to residents in the proximity of the requested <br />streetlight. <br /> <br />Council Action: <br /> <br />Motion to ratify the recommendation of the Public Works Committee. <br /> <br />Case #2: <br /> <br />Consider Selection of Engineer to Coordinate Water Utility Projects and <br />Design Well House and Connecting Watermains <br /> <br />Requests for proposal were sent to three engineering consultants, and responses were received by <br />all three. Staff recommended a preference for Bolton and Menk, Inc. The Public Works <br />Committee recommended that staff negotiate with Bolton and Menk to establish an acceptable <br />budget for performing the service. <br /> <br />Council Action: <br /> <br />Motion to ratify the recommendation of the Public Works Committee. <br /> <br /> <br />