Laserfiche WebLink
Mallard Ponds Review Letter <br />April 2O, 2000 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />10. <br /> <br />Off Street ParMng Nodes: Per Staff's request, some additional parking nodes have been <br />identified on the Grading Plan and the Utility Plan. These 23 additional off-street parking <br />spaces should also be incorporated onto the Preliminary Plat. <br /> <br />Utilitw' Plan and Drainage and Utili~ Easements: The standard 10 foot (5 foot on <br />common property lines) drainage and utility easements have been provided. Per Staff's <br />recommendation, the wetlands on the east boundary of the plat will be encumbered with a <br />drainage and utility easement. <br /> <br />Lot Areas: In the absence of updated zoning regulations per the newly drafted <br />Comprehensive Plan, Staff will be utilizing the current 15 unit/acre zoning district, <br />Multiple Residential (IVfR), as a guideline in establishing performance standards for this <br />proposed PUD. The MR district regulations establish a minimum lot size of 3,000 square <br />feet for multi-family structures in a PUD; all of the townhouse lots are at least 3,300 <br />square feet in size. <br /> <br />Park Dedication: The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed plat on <br />February 10, 2000. Park dedication will consist of a cash payment in the amount of <br />$1,200 per townhouse unit. They aisc recommended the construction of a sidewalk along <br />Barium Street. to Dysprosium and south to County Road #116. This sidewalk is not park <br />dedication credit eligible. <br /> <br />Landscape Plan: Staff has reviewed the landscape plan dated February 14, 2000, noting <br />that it meets the minimum requirements provided that the plan addresses the following: <br /> <br />1. The plan should identify which areas will receive irrigation. <br />2. Tree save fences must be used in all areas with existing trees that are not to be <br /> disturbed. <br />3. Increasing number of plantings on the north boundary to intensify screening <br /> capability. <br /> <br />In addition, staff is presuming that the homeowners association or others will be <br />responsible for additional landscaping beyond the "one tree and two shrubs per lot". <br />Also, the developer should consider an additional species or two for the front yard tree for <br />long term disease resistance and variety. Relative to the shrub types, it is noted that <br />spirea and barberrys are typically over used in landscapes. Also of note is that the second <br />item in the shrub key is Black Hills Spruce; this is ac ~knowledged as an error. <br /> <br />Commercial/industrial properties have been required to place trees 35 feet on center or <br />less along frontage streets. The front yard trees in this development suffice for this <br /> <br />188 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />