My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/27/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 06/27/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:44:28 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 11:19:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/27/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
particular tank which is less than one quarter of one percentage over the October 15, 2001 <br />completion date, The steel fluted tank was selected over the composite tank for several reasons. <br />First, the steel tanks have a well established track record. With proper coating maintenance a <br />steel tank can last nearly indefinitely. There are many steel tanks, which are over 100 years old. <br />The composite tank however, has a masonry concrete base and has been widespread use for only <br />10 - 15 years and mostly in the south which is less subject to freeze/thaw cycles. A second <br />concern with the masonry base is the high maintenance cost of sandblasting if it becomes the <br />target of graffiti. Graffiti can be washed off a painted steel tank comparatively easily with a <br />chemical solvent. Finally one of the ancillary benefits of either water tank is the storage <br />available within the base of the tank. However, the steel tank has a radius of 25 ft. which is six <br />feet longer than the composite giving the steel tank nearly 30% more storage area inside its base <br />than the composite tank. <br /> <br />Council Action: <br /> <br />Motion to: <br /> <br />Adopt Resolution awarding the contract for Water Tower No. 2 to PDM in the amount of <br />$1,445,000,00 <br /> <br />Review by: <br /> <br />City Administrator <br />Director of Public Works <br />Parks & Utilities Supervisor <br /> <br />CC: <br /> <br />06/27/00 <br /> <br />182 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.