My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/08/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 08/08/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:45:28 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 11:43:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/08/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> <br />the Comprehensive Plan and the applicant's intent to develop the property with single family <br />residential lots. The plat design including lot sizes, density, tree preservation, street layouts, <br />grading and drainage plans, sewer/water/storm sewer plans, etc. are all subject to the current <br />regulations for the R-1 Urban Residential District and Chapter 14 of the City Charter. The <br />Planning Commission opened the public hearing on June 6, 2000. Residents and Planning <br />Commissioners raised questions which required legal expertise. The Planning Commission <br />continued the public hearing to July 10, 2000 and requested the City Attorney be present to <br />address any legal issues. Once the Comprehensive Plan has been adopted or amended, cities <br />must conform their land use regulations in accordance with the plan.. The property has been in <br />the MUSA since 1995 and staff recommended approval of rezoning the property from R-1 Rural <br />Residential to R-1 Urban Residential. It was also noted that the moratorium on this property <br />expired on May 12, 2000. <br /> <br />Citizen Input <br /> <br />Kerry Manuel, 15668 Juniper Ridge Drive NW, Ramsey, stated that he is part of a large group <br />that was formed in the area to oppose the rezoning of the land. He explained that all the adjacent <br />properties were developed into one acre lots and the residents were promised by the developer <br />that the property in question would also be developed into one acre lots. <br /> <br />Brent Smith, 15620 Yakima Street NW, Ramsey, stated that when the property was rezoned <br />previously it was done against the advice of the attorney because a public hearing was not held <br />by the City and the residents will do what they have to enforce the issue. <br /> <br />Chairperson Anderson stated that the land in 1993 was not within the MUSA and the City <br />Council made a request to include the property within the MUSA, which was approved in 1995 <br />by the Met Council. He stated that it was his understanding that there was never a formal <br />rezoning changing the property from R-1 Rural to R-1 Urban Residential. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that that was correct. <br /> <br />Chairperson Anderson inquired if the rezoning could be denied by the City since the property is <br />included within the MUSA. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that the City could deny the request, but would need to develop <br />reasons fbr the denial and denial could be a difficult challenge in court to defend. He explained <br />that the current Comprehensive Plan guides the property as urban residential and State Statue <br />states that a City must be in conformance with their Comprehensive Plan. But if there is solid <br />information that is brought out during the public hearing pertaining to issues such as utilities or <br />traffic, there may be reason to deny the rezoning. Mr. Goodrich also noted that the City cannot <br />deny the rezoning request on the basis that the entire neighborhood is against the rezoning. <br /> <br />Chairperson Anderson stated that City Code requires that a concept plan be submitted with a <br />rezoning application, which was done. But the concept plan does not conform to the City <br /> <br />Planning Commission/July 10, 2000 <br /> Page 3 of 20 <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.