My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10/05/10
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
Minutes
>
2010's
>
2010
>
10/05/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2025 1:27:51 PM
Creation date
2/22/2011 1:27:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
Document Date
10/05/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chairperson Dehen stated he did not feel anyone here agrees that second project is competitive <br />but the question is, do we continue to talk with them about possibly bringing in another project. <br />Commissioner Ramsey stated they cannot compete without a subsidy. <br />Chairperson Dehen expressed agreement with Commissioner Ramsey. He stated right now their <br />offer is not as good, so we say no we will not accept this but we will consider other options. <br />Commissioner Wise stated we cannot be so shortsighted to think of businesses coming in that do <br />not have an effect on other businesses — how many gas stations are sitting empty for example. <br />Commissioner Elvig stated we have someone who has seen this market place. They have paid a <br />premium for them to come in here. It's wrong for us to say we will restrict others. He totally <br />agreed with the free market but he thinks we have to initiate conversation with these people. If <br />we say yes to $17 a square foot, then we need to make sure the price is not fixed for anyone else <br />wanting to come in. He did not want to dictate who comes in but he stated he thought we should <br />go back to them. <br />Commissioner Ramsey stated it's a free market but we own the land and we need to make sure <br />our entire project is successful. <br />Chairperson Dehen stated they are not competitive but the question is what do we do with them. <br />Do we say they are not competition so get out of here or do we go back and say we are not <br />selling this for less than $17 a square foot and we do not give them a subsidy. <br />Commissioner Ramsey stated we say we are not accepting any other plans for this type of <br />business — if it changes we will go back to them. <br />Commissioner Wise stated that if you have a study showing it will not be able to be supported, <br />it's stupid to allow this. <br />Commissioner Elvig stated that retail develops retail — energy develops energy. What if <br />someone came in with $19 a square foot — do we take it — of course we would — we would let <br />them "duke it out ". <br />Commissioner McGlone stated we are not The COR world. We have a responsibility to the <br />taxpayers to pay attention to what studies are telling us. It sounds and looks stupid on paper and <br />at $19 a square foot — it's still stupid. <br />Development Manager Lazan stated that you take away a big chunk of creating value by picking <br />and choosing pieces. The product and return will be better. He felt that generally the <br />government needs to stay out of it, but we are the landowners. <br />Commissioner Wise talked about reasons for putting certain like businesses next to each other. <br />Housing and Redevelopment Authority / October 5, 2010 <br />Page 5 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.