My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10/05/10
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
Minutes
>
2010's
>
2010
>
10/05/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2025 1:27:51 PM
Creation date
2/22/2011 1:27:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
Document Date
10/05/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Look stated if the second party is higher he would advocate going back and <br />talking to them. Why are we picking and choosing which ones we are doing free market for we <br />are not subsidizing one against the other. He stated he did not want any exclusivity unless <br />someone wants to pay for it. There is nothing like letting people know others are interested — it <br />builds an incentive. <br />Discussion ensued relating to ability to pick and choose and what has been said to one or the <br />other - Commissioner Wise cautioned that our word is gold. <br />Commissioner Elvig stated to be careful about saying pick and choose. He agreed at times we <br />will pick and choose but he did not feel we want to start that precedent. We can pick and choose <br />by money only. He asked if there was a consensus that we send Mr. Lazan to say we are not <br />interested unless they substantially increase the price. <br />Commissioner Wise stated we are going with the original. <br />Commissioner Ramsey asked if the consensus is we are not interested at this time and we will let <br />them know if anything changes <br />Commissioner Elvig and Chairperson Dehen stated we could say we are not interested unless <br />they raise their offer significantly and there are no subsidies. <br />Commissioner Look stated we did not go through a bidding process. We need something in the <br />ground. This is a live one and we should get going on it. In the future when we have less land, <br />let's start playing ball. <br />Consensus was to cut them lose and contact them if something changes. <br />Case #3: Consider Proposed Development at NE Quadrant of Ramsey Boulevard and <br />BNSF Railroad <br />Development Manager Lazan stated this site was the subject of efforts in the past to locate a gun <br />range and pro shop facility. After discussions back and forth, the Development Team reached <br />out to the proposed business owner in an effort to structure a deal within The COR for this user <br />and several sites were explored. After considerable discussion, it appeared the use may best be <br />suited for the original property. If this is acceptable to everyone, he would bring an offer back to <br />the next HRA meeting. The user can move forward with the project on the piece of land on the <br />east side of Ramsey Boulevard outside The COR. He talked about some of the concerns with <br />areas inside The COR for this type of business. We reworked that site plan to get three pads on <br />that site plus we are working on parking configurements. He stated this is outside The COR so <br />he is asking the HRA to extend his contract outside The COR. He noted that a considerable <br />amount of time had been spent on this and he would like to close the deal. He proposed a scaled - <br />down version of his agreement in The COR and he would like to fine -tune this and bring it back. <br />Commissioner Ramsey stated he is not confident in this site plan as we need to know the on and <br />off ramps; however, he is fine with the project. <br />Housing and Redevelopment Authority / October 5, 2010 <br />Page 6 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.