Laserfiche WebLink
This item was tabled. <br /> <br />Case #4: <br /> <br />Update on Rademacher/T.ff. #47 Access Lane <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that Bill's Superette was very interestei:l::~'' retain~:~i~eir <br />existing ingress from T.H. ~47. In the development agreement it was d~ that the e~g~ <br />ingress would be eliminated when the intersection of 153r~ AvenUe an~:(T::~ ff-47 <br /> .... -.:r~:.:: :- :~. *,'ie~ ~~ . <br />s~gnahzed. Mr. Jankowski &scussed a proposal w~th MnDOT th~ ~0uld allo~' for an regress <br />from T.H. ff47 at a point greater than 600 feet from the intersec~:~6~ P~b~i'd'ing that the <br />access to T.H. #47 be dedicated to the State on the other tw6:'}~cels sou~ of Bill's Superette. <br />The Committee was presented with a letter from Mr. K.~fi Hoglus:~:~9f MnDOT responding <br />favorably to this proposal. Mr. Jankowski explained th~(~. Rademadh~:'~wns Parcel #2 and is <br /> <br /> working with a developer who is proposing combi~g:F~i~el #2 witk::;~'~et ~#3 to construct a <br /> townhome complex. A portion of the concept plan s~ggests <br /> neighborhood to 153~ Avenue ra~er than Barium S~eet, <br /> cli~c. He also noted that the developer's plus utilized the e~te~;po~on o.fLot..~ ~2, w~ch <br /> has been previously suggested ~ be~g~mmed ov~ to the Ci~. ~e C3~)~ouJ~'~"~e use offs <br /> parcel to relocate a problematic pond~7~r~ i~ Willow ~dge or ~e e~-~'~:ide)~ B~ S~eet. <br /> A preliminaW ~alysis suggests.. ~.:':~~:~s.. for drainag~,an~:::~:~ow~omes would <br /> e~st, pamicul~ly if the cI~c .w4Utd ~w ~e ~X'i~ih~7~ond to be sq~:~d up" by allow~g its <br /> expansion ~ its southwest c;~~. ~}~}~ows~ ~:~t:a~t~bugh this proposal may be <br /> somewhat complex, s~ce it would Mvoi~':~ee pr~ ow~:~:~ ~e Ci, of Ramsey, it has <br /> sever~ potenhal benefits: <br /> <br /> 1) Reduce ~o..~i~fi~al(~eesses onto T.H}5:5~} from P=cels 2 ~d 3 to a sNgle Ngess access <br /> <br /> Prowde.~ access from ~fi, ne~ghborhood to,:~:53~ Avenue ~d a s~ahzed mtersectmn. <br /> 3) M~t:~needs of ~e c~c, wNch hopes <br /> <br /> 4) Provide f~ ~olufi3n~¢:~::d;~:~;5iem expefi~c~-in ~e Willow mdge.subdivision. <br /> <br /> ~,C,:?(~:Staff;reco~ended-proposing a swap of ~e right-of-access from pmcels ~o and ~ee to <br />.:4~}~:'; ~'OT-~ remm for i°m~c~:gan in,ess ody access into p~cel ~1 contingent upon: <br /> <br /> 1) ~e su~¢mt dra~ag~(eaiement be dedicated to the Ci, to exp~d the cli~c wetl~d, such <br /> that ~e no~erly sedimentation pond in Willow ~dge can be abandoned; ~d <br /> 2) ~e non-fe~l portion of the conduction of the ~ess access be reimbursed to the Ci~. <br /> 3) ~at Rademacher, ~c. dedicate as fi~t-of-way the e~tem 60 feet of P~cel ~1 ~ Barium <br /> <br /> C~Unc~ber Hendfiksen stated that the Council has t~en the position that a business does <br /> ~; · ~ :: :. <br /> not' automatically have right of access if the p~cel has access from another way. He indicated <br /> that P~cel g2 has access along Barium Street and Parcel g3 has access from Cobalt Street. He <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />-16- <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/June 20, 2000 <br /> Page 4 of 7 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />