Agenda - Council - 09/13/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

also indicated that he would not "cut a deal" that is contingent upon the assumption th e will be a high density configuration adjacent to single family homes. ,H,,e requested future staff prepare cases pertaining to fight of access using the wording fight of ac¢~9~laimed'~}~i2'' by.." or wording recommended by the City Attorney, which would more the Cities position. Councilmember Zimmerman inquired if it is the perception of Bill's since highway approved to the fight-in access they will receive the access. City Engineer Jankowski replied no. Councflmember Hendnksen noted that Bill s Superette agre~ that ,ould g/vd up the fight of access when the intersection of 153~ Avenue and was Councilmember Zimmerman stated that if the City is then the City would expect something in return and not anyway as part of the development. only access would be required to do Consensus of the Committee was to.ifi~ii~?the developer and a worksession to discuss the ~ssues further. /¢,., ,..?.,:.~ Case ~5: Update on 153/155 Proj~t Land AcqUisifionT;7 CiW Engineer J~ows~ stated ~at im~Qvm~t:'?PrQect ~;51 is ~e extension of 153/155 ~om 155~h and Vafiolite to 153a ~d ~S~0~'~50ulev~d. ~s 0.7 mile s2etch of~ghway is · e last remai~ng ge~ent'.°7 a cross-ciW, e~:~West MSA roadway condor ~ ~e CiW. ~e last issfi}~, bffore thi~':project c~ be co~g:~is the acquisition of ~e fight-of-way. At r~ai~ng the May 16; '2000 Public Wor~s Com~ee ~;qt w~ reported that ~ee of seven p~cels required'hake been obtaine&t~ ~e follow~gi~'update of the r~ai~ng unacqufied parcels. Parcel g2, o~ed by Jeff'S~be~,. has ~,:~O~:~isal value of $100. It is a ve~ sm~l parcel, less th~ 500 squar~'~feet...~e Proj'eet 7m:~h';~hally be constructed wi~out ~s pmcel. CiW Council had directed that '~he Offer to m. Sc~;'~3~; be raised to $500 and ~at me project be conducted ~dthbut the p~cel if~: .Sc~oeder declined· At ~e time of ~e meeting ~ere was no .response :-" :"~'3~:'~ Sc~oeder. P~i g34S owned by M. ~om~ Auel. ~e prop~ h~ been appraised at $4,400·' Staff met with-:.~.~Auel and he indicated ~at he ~ought ~e prope~ w~ wo~ $10,000, althopgh he dee~ned to get an independent appraisal at ~e CiW's expense. Staff extended a se~0nd offer t~ ~. Auel for $6,000, which was ~ved at by ~e~g Ce appraisal price by 25% P!~ paying the $500 for ~e appraisal ~at he is entitled to at the CiW's expense. ~. Auel countered the offer at $6,500. I I I '~-.:;;.Motion. rbY':'Councilmember Hendriksen, seconded by Councilmember Zimmermast, to f%~)mmend: that City Council direct staff to conclude the deal with Mr. Auel within the context of ihe-fie;zotiating discussed. Public Works Committee/June 20, 2000 Page 5 of 7 -17-