Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman inquired if there would be someone on-site all the t/me <br />the building. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith replied that she is there a lot of the time, but not all the time. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik noted that there would be <br />time, <br /> <br />srs on-site <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson stated that they are only guarantyin: <br />on duty at all times and one nurse. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith replied that they will overlap staff as <br />time. <br /> <br />Councilmember Connolly inquired as to the authority the <br />issues. <br /> <br />nurse <br /> <br />one health aid <br /> <br />:, at the building full- <br /> <br />for discussing staffing <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that <br /> <br />is licensed and <br /> <br />State. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen <br />different decisions by the fact"'~t <br />not exist. If the Council were <br />second dwelling to be constructed they <br />be addressed in th~,finding,s, of fact. <br /> <br />City Attomey'~B~dfich inqfi?d if thee w~ <br />Co~[~:::Development ~D~ector Frol~ <br /> <br />there <br /> a <br /> <br />that <br /> <br />and come up with <br />be different if they did <br />were requested to allow a <br />and inquired if that should <br /> <br />the tunnel. <br /> <br />yes and stated that it was inspected by the <br /> <br /> City Attorney G -~.:~:: .... stated that it wc d be appropriate to state that the situation is unique <br />.,,.,~,:~.~:7'::~.anfl Lhat It would be,..: doubtful that a sLrnllar s~tuat~on would be granted ~n the future. He <br /> recommended the follov~mg,.chag;ges to the findings of fact: <br /> <br /> · F~nd~ngs'o~fact #8 b~ .amended to read That the tunnel had been prewously constructed. <br /> · Add fin&~g bf fact #I~7 to read That to deny the use of the second dwelling as a dwellmg <br /> umt would .tSe.~a hardship to the exmt~ng property owners as they purchased the property ~n ~ts <br /> current patchily complete condition as a dwelling unit and the use most feasible is its current <br /> condition-i~?& dwelling." <br /> · ; i.,:,Add finding of fact #18 to read '~That the Council finds that this is a unique circumstance and <br /> "i'::.?he ~nting of a conditional use permit shall not be deemed a precedent to allow new <br /> 'cOnst~ction of two principal structures on a parcel in violation of City Code." <br /> <br />City Council/October 24, 2000 <br /> Page 13 of 31 <br /> <br />-145- <br /> <br /> <br />