Agenda - Council - 11/14/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

· Add finding of fact #19 to read .' That if the property is sold in the future the c0nditi~{.~S permit will end and any continued use would require a new application.'' '~i~}?'~ ~'~i?"':::i~ Motion by Councilmember Hendriksen, seconded by Councilmember Conn'0~'7.'~to adop Resolution #00-i0- adopting the Findings of,Fact # as reco~'d:~f~!:~.City Attorney, relating to Loving Care Senior Service s request for a con~'fi'~fi use p~}~:~=.to maintain a second dwelling on a parcel. '~)~. ~ Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers H Ic :,Connolly, derson, and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. ~?.~' Motion by Councilmember, Hendfiksen, seconded by ~G~'U~i~ilmemb~ Connolly, to Loving Care Senior Services request for a conditionaT~(e permit, ~i~Tkould terminat ' th roe is sold in the future, based on the findings- ~{~i:~'~d adopting!~bt:ution #00-10- declaring terms of same. . . :~i?,.;:i?:?~ Motion carried. Voting' Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers t-Iehd~pn,,.~e~ :::':~. C°rn}'~'~!lY'~,t-.~:~> Anderson, and Zimmerman. Voting No: None..~,~.~ "~i}.~i}?. Case #3: R q.e t for a CO aifi6nkt to: :xceea Fenca:- ight Restmtio-s; · Case of Al Ke~'i~f ":}~(7!!:~' ~i;~i~?:~' ~ ~*!iit2%' ' Co--unity Development Director Frolik:~;~.~ ~3~ ~. Al.~mpf resides at 1522p.St., Fr~c~ Boulevard ~, R~sey~.As p~ of the T:~::~7 ~provemeht prQect, ~. Kempf lost severat mature trees that;~e'lomted be~een Ce ~6flt of his home ~d the highway. ~. Kempf has stated that tho~'trees acted~;a noise and ~'~2}~b~ ~om ~e tramc. ~. Kempf approached Ci, staff~e~arding const~)~g a six foot ~'fence across the font of ~s prope~ to replace::~b'bUffehng effect~f~kio~ly provi4~7~::~he ~ees. m. Kmpf was ~fo~ed that ~ont yard ~f~:~e resthcted't3'~rafiye fence~;'~ exceeding four feet in height. On September 7, 2000, ~e Ci*:r~deNed}~fi~:'~¢Hdat~;n''~'~m;X1 Kempf for a conditional Use pe~it to exceed ~e four foot ~ont y~:'~¢~ce heist resection. One concern wi~ ~ont y~d fences is ~at they do .~,-~':~b~b~s~ct Visibiii~}~bf the house numbers ~om ~e public road, especially for ~ergence :': a site vk~si~¢.j:~ bed~e app~ent that ~. Kempf is proposing to located ~e fence approxima~ei~o to t~:e~f~nto the ~ghway fight-of-way. If ~e fence were placed on ~e front prope~.}::!ine, it ~':~y likely ~at some of the trees ~at did su~ive Ce highway improvementS:~(~ould be~'~amaged. Staff consulted ~. Keith VanWa~er ~ ~e ~OT Pe~its Divisi~n~ He indicated ~at ~. Kempf would need a pe~t from ~OT m order to locate the feneeak proposed, but it is highly u~ikely that such a pe~it would be ~ted. ~.~ :~(~, V~Wa~er st~d that as an alternative, ~OT may consider allowing the establis~ent of ~':" ~:' ad~fi~fi~l vegetation in the highway fight-of-way. ~e Plying Co~ssion met on SOme October o:,. _000 and conducted a public hearing. There were no wh~en or verbal co~ents submiged at the heating. Related to the request for a conditional use pe~it, ~. Kempf is requesting that the $100.00 application fee and $300.00 escrow fee be waived because he feels I I I I I I -146- City Council/October 24, 2000 Page 14 of 31