Agenda - Council - 11/14/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I the need for the fence is a direct result of the T.H. #47 improvement project. The Commission recommended approval of the request for a six foot high fence, but only is located entirely on the subject property. Evidence of a permit from for a fence that encroaches the highway right-of-way. Staff has also drafted the placement of address number son the fence that are at least four inches recommendation of the Fire Chief/Public Works Director Dean Kapler. of the conditional use permit application and escrow fees will be based require the I I I I I I I I A1 Kempf, 15220 St. Francis Boulevard NW, Ramsey stated tha' indicated that he would need a permit from MnDOT to bui limits, but he wants to avoid further damage to the roots on~ that he talked to the MnDOT inspector three times, the not issue permits, the second conversation the ' supervisor and get back to him which never himself. Mr. Kaydenhip stated that after the project ~s coml: the property. He also questioned when the property markers he had the construction that were saved, He stated that MnDOT does would contact his Kaydenhip what he did on City Engineer Jankowski noted that the sod on the project will go going to attempt to put sod on the of-way markers he will check Mr. Kempf stated that #15 of activities and uses that' will be reason of excessive production of traffic that the entire high,way. Project is guilty road and don't kfi~¢'v~h~ ir'is included in building pe~ryg,,. [tii~e becaus~':~e City is less affecteab~ the road, the but they are :and side streets this fall. to the right- they will be put' ,~osed use will not involve or the general welfare by or odors." It is his feeling ~e for the iople that live along the frontage of fact. He also requested a waiver to the on the other side of T.H. ~47. that are not agreed to a price to the damages on the be included in that process. ~,~i;~i~,' :Attorney that if the City were to waive the fees then Mr Kempf would have to agree, tO n. ot tnclude those.ch~?s as part of the condemnation proceedings. Councilmemb~,Hendrikse~ifiquired if the Ci~ A~omey w~ suggesting that ~e CiW re,nd the fee to Mr. Kem~ as pa~ o'f the condemation proceedings, or not collect ~e fees ~d stipulate ~at it isa dam~}~..~,,, that h~ occu~ed ~d have ~. Kempf a~ee not to claim ~e fees. ,Mr. Kempfn~'~ that he has already deposited the ~nds'wi~ the CiW. '.[: ,~ , :,';? 2~, :. ::'".~;.? C~nsensus. 0F the Council was that ~e fees should be stipulated as pa~ of the damages to the pr°P h~d returned back to Mr. Kempf. City Council/October 24, 2000 Page 15 of 31 -147-