Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />the same. Which he felt is exactly what the Attorney General had stated in March of <br />Goodrich reviewed the statement made by the Attorney General. <br /> <br />Mr. Thompson stated that it is the opinion of the City that the overall the cost' <br />and projects involved that the City is paying for is an overall system and an o, the <br />community, but in this case residents are being assessed $6.00 per <br />are being assessed considerably more. He stated that the cost of the water ~.ff should <br />equally just like everything else in the tax system. Mr. he d~d not <br />that State Statue 444.075 was intended to be used in this water mn-off and "'~., <br />that it is an improper implementation and use of this ' d fi' there ~s' a <br />property that can demonstrate that water does not into a weuana <br />that is self contained how is that property owner <br /> .~)~ <br /> <br />Mr. Olson replied that he is sure that there were a <br />provided mn-off from their property, but when <br />apparent. He explained that if a property owner wants to prove <br />25 year storm then they can apply for a 25 percent credit. <br /> <br /> did not feel they <br /> problem was <br />that they can handle a <br /> <br />Mr. Thompson replied that this <br />chose to impose this charge. H <br />have been handled as an ' <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec replied approximately <br />proposing a budget increase this year, <br />charge in the way 9f a-storm drainage <br /> x~ ~,"-:~"-~.; ~:" ':-:.~r:,, ' <br />Councdmembert:tendnksen,,shted that if the <br />then the properties that have gone through a <br />then' own property would not-.?:rece~ve any <br />based' on a residential <br /> <br />handled as an overall <br />overall tax <br /> <br /> the City <br />be if it would <br /> <br />that the City is already <br />Council was to handle the <br /> <br /> ,to assess the same rate for every Property <br /> amount of effort to contain their water on <br />He explained that the basic unit charge is <br />,fl that a property creates the more they will be <br />within the guidelines that are imposed, and do it <br /> <br /> charged. He <br /> !~ a fair and equi~tl~[:~'i~'ay. <br /> <br /> La~"peterson, Co~::;En~, 14601 R~sey Boulev~d ~, Rmsey, stated ~at they. <br /> question the~ ~u~ ~n the eh~ges and ~e foundation used to assess ~e ch~ges. He noted ~at <br /> ~ey have no~:;P'~d the ch~es and don't see paying ~em in the ~ediate ~mre. <br /> <br /> CiW Engineer Ol~on explained ~e process for detem~ng the charge. <br /> <br />.,.~. Pet~som~quired ~f each s~te w~ vtewed ~nd~v~dually. <br /> <br />C~ En~ne~r Olson replied that an aerial photo,apb was used ~0m 1997. <br /> ...}..i~, :. ,' <br /> <br />City Council/September 26, 2000 <br /> Page 21 of 36 <br /> <br />-77- <br /> <br /> <br />