My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/14/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 11/14/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:48:47 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 1:00:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/14/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
307
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Peterson replied that he feels that there are some inequities and that he does not believi~'~at <br /> all business are being assessed equitably. <br /> <br /> calculation was made on all non-residential prope~ies:U~g'the s~e <br /> ~. Olson replied eat a ~??, <br /> <br /> ~. Peterson stated that as p~ of Ce plamng process and developmen~:~f'~eir,.~_ ..... build~g~'~Y, <br /> had to meet c~ain requirements which included the h~dling of sto~' ,~ate~?~Co~exus <br /> has invested $250,000 to $o00,000 in dong so ~d now the .C~'~is'sahng~:~m to pay <br /> additional $10,000 per ye~. :~ <br /> <br /> Ci~ Engineer Olson replied that he realizes ~at Co~ex~"spent a la of money fo a store <br /> sewer system, but all of &e hcilities that were ~eated. b~iQ6~exus Mg~3een mined over to ~e <br /> Ciw for ma~tenance. ":~;~:' ~:;~i~5;~,,. <br /> <br /> ~. Peterson replied that that was co~ect, but stated that th~-~'.5}~5~ be willing to cle~ me <br /> ponds to save ~e $10,000 per ye~. ' ~s_ <br /> CiW En~neer Olson replied ~at if cb~e~,.wanted to t~e over ~e maNt~ance of the ponds <br /> and receive Ce credit from the C~they cout'd:dotha, <br /> <br /> ~. Peterson stated that ~e W~i&rshed-D}s}ficts have_~e::0bli~fiofi~o clean coun~ &tches and <br /> for ~at re,on questioned why the Cl, ~'.}~ollect~;'m~ney' i~:~the work fo~ ~em. - <br /> Ci~ En~neer J~ows~ stated that ~e CO~.C~eek Waterihed Distr/ct h~ taken over some <br /> Coun~ ditches ~ th~ar~_~d have a~eeff)~¢.clean them, but no~ng simil~ has happened <br /> Ce Ci, of ~ms~y. He '~xPlained that the ~ or'Kinsey h~ a ~O (Water M~agement <br /> ~ganizati6d): ~at is ~nded~contfibutions o~'e)~0:~r cities ~at m~e up ~e ~O. <br /> ~. Peters0:~_~ted that ~;ie:~e.different rgt?-~for different water management districts. <br /> CiW A~omey G°odhch' rep lied that ~at was not comect. <br /> <br />.,::~(?;'::~i~:E~eer J~ows~i:'~xpla~ that the a=ual budget for the ~O is $20,000. <br /> ~. Peterson'smted that he:isffamili~ with water shed dis~cts and they usually assess for special <br /> <br /> Councilmemb~ ~derson replied that the Water Shed Dis~cts and ~O ~e legally a different <br /> body. -'. <br /> <br /> Counci~em~er Hendfiksen reviewed the content of the ~O explaimg that the intent of the <br /> ~O ik to leave the majohu of the projects to the individual cities. <br /> <br />I <br />! <br /> <br />i <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />-78- <br /> <br />City Council/September 26, 2000 <br /> Page 22 of 36 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.