Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seco,haled by Commissioner Kociscak, to recommen~t <br /> City, Council approve Cathleen A_rn-nan s request for a ·conditional use permit <br /> occupation based on the findings of fact. <br /> <br /> Motion Camed. Voting Yes: Chmrperson N~xt, Commissioners Johnson, Komscak, <br /> Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Griffiths and Wivoda. <br /> <br /> Case #9' Request for Site Plan Review of M & W Holding 'Com""~; <br /> Case <br /> of <br /> <br /> Community Development Assistant Wald stated that the C~5~.~'Ramsey l'ihs received a request <br /> for site plan review from M&W Holding Company. Th~!~:ig plan i§;~0Posing to construct a <br /> 2,200 square foot off-sale hquor store. The area ~s g~n~ located so~::0f 146 Avenue and <br /> west of Armstrong Boulevard (County Road #83). ~;}i~:)~i zoned Br3!:~ay Business, off- <br /> sale hquor facdmes are perrmtted m the H~ghway BusmessZ,~gm~::7/The '~tructure meets all <br /> Highway Business setback requirements and is in compli~'~;~ the 35% lot coverage <br /> restriction. The s~te plan ~s proposm= to gmn access fi-om 146 Avm:tue and another access point <br /> will be derived fi-om an existing access off of County Road #83 (~lro~¢g~B!Nd.) that also <br /> serves the Oasis Market and video~:d;h~%~l dr/veways and off-stre"~i}~g areas will be <br /> paved and fimshed with B-6/l_ CUrlsmg~ Thei-e~erio~r,building materials:;~eProposed to consist <br /> of vinyl siding andcoronado,:, ' 'a"~8=e. Th'~'~;~'~ed,,.siding dev~;~ fi-om the Highway <br /> Business architectural standard'g and w~:..~eed C~ty C~tmm. I:.:~pm.v.~>: Screening ~s not reqmred <br /> because the adjacent parcels are zoned ~h:.way e~;s and al. The applicant needs to <br /> clarify ~f the west port, on of the property ~,~.,.,~ m ~ts c~ent state. Staff ~s recommending <br /> that the area have some type of manicured'i~7~-Whe facility =~iI1 be served by an on-site septic <br /> system. The ~.!t~'SS-prop~i~g to share an '~ting well with the business immediately to the <br /> South. The .a~ti'~ant will'~'ed to get the S~_H.eiil:th Department's approval to share a well <br /> between two:~ropert~es. ?i~,:!.~ <br /> <br /> ChaO}ersonC~xt inquir, edX~taff_h~O=.view:e~l~e color renderings. <br /> <br /> Commumty DeveI0pm~nt Assistant Wald replied no. <br /> <br /> Chai~ers~,~N~xt stated'~he~'~ould hke to see color renderings in the furore as part of the site <br /> plan revCW ~rocess. '~:5~;;,~ <br /> <br /> 79~'{:?:5165m A~hue NW, presented the Commission with a printed example of the <br /> Jeff Wise, .... <br /> colors they are::¢':~ posing for the building. <br /> <br />'~}(;.Motion by C~issioner Johnson, seconded by Com.m/ssioner Kociscak, to recommend that <br /> '"'?~ity.. Co~n'~'(':5~pprove the proposed site plan for M & W Holding Company contingent upon <br /> ~6mplian~With city staff review letter dated October 31, 2000· <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />-112- <br /> <br />Planning Commission/November 6, 2000 <br /> Page 7 of 23 <br /> <br /> <br />