My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/12/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 12/12/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:50:12 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 2:20:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/12/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
328
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-102- <br /> <br />Case #3: <br /> <br />Request for a Conditional Use Permit to Maintain Two Dwellings on One. <br />Parcel; Case of Stephen & Pamela Upton <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated that City Code states that there shall not be more <br />than one main building on a lot unless otherwise provided for in City Code. Mr. and Mrs. Upton <br />reside at 16101 Ramsey Boulevard NW, Ramsey, and they are requesting a conditional use <br />permit to maintain a second dwelling (guest cottage) on the property to provide separate living <br />quarters £or Mrs. Upton's mother when she visits for extended periods of time. The subject <br />property is approximately 2.6 acres in size and is located in the rural services area. Mr. and Mrs. <br />Upton have a 528 square foot attached garage (2 stall), and two other detached accessory <br />buildings that are 384 square feet and 1,080 square feet in size. When the Uptons purchased the <br />property, the 1,080 square foot detached accessory building was already heated, sheet rocked, <br />and supplied with'a working bathroom and electricity. The applicants would like to convert the <br />existing detached accessory building into a guest cottage to provide separate living quaffers for <br />Mrs. Upton's mother when she stays for extended periods of time. Mrs. Upton's mother visits <br />quite fi'equently and is unable to climb the stairs in the main dwelling. If the City approves the <br />conditional use permit request, the applicants are proposing to install carpet, cabinets, windows, <br />and a shower to provide for one batln'oom, a kitchenette with dining area, living room, and one <br />bedroom. Mr. and Mrs. Upton do not intend to rent or lease the dwelling to persons at large. <br />Recently, Loving Care Senior Services received approval to maintain two dwellings on one <br />parcel to provide for a nurse's living quarters and is the only past case that does not maintain <br />compliance with the four units in 40 acres density rule. Upon reviewing Loving Care Senior <br />Services and Don Kveton's request for a conditional use pm-mit to maintain two dwellings on a <br />parcel, the City Council stated that applications for two dwellings on a property should be <br />· viewed as a means to remedy a unique or already existing situation. The Council also noted that <br />they do not intend to set a precedent in allowing two dwellings on a parcel when new <br />construction is required. The Plam:ing Commission conducted a public hearing and reviewed the <br />request at their regular meeting on November 6, 2000. There were no written or verbal <br />comments submitted to the Plmming Commission. The Plmming Commission recommended <br />approval of Mr. and Mrs. Upton's request to maintain, two dwellings on their property with <br />restriction placed on the occupancy of the second dwelling. The Plam~ing Commission does not <br />want to see the dwelling be used as a revenue generating rental property due to' the rural single <br />family characteristic of the neighborhood. The Commission recommended that the City Council <br />restrict the conditional use permit occupancy to relatives. City staff has defined the term <br />"relative" to be someone who is related to the applicants by blood, mmriage, or adoption. · <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that it has been a controversial issue as to whether or not a City <br />can restrict a use to only family members, bnt the U.S. Supreme Court states that it is <br />permissible. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if the applicant will be charging family members for use of <br />the unit. <br /> <br />Steve Upton, 16101 Ramsey Boulevard NW, Ramseyl replied no. <br /> <br />City Council/November 28, 2000 <br /> Page 8 of 21 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> I <br />.I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.