Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated that based on the denial, there is no reason to proceed with <br />5 and 6. <br /> <br />Mr. Sacco stated that they have certain obligations with the property <br />w6uld like to fulfill and requested that the Commission address those ca~' <br /> <br />they <br /> <br /> Community Development Director Fr01ik stated that the use of the <br /> the subdivision so the Commission could act on Case 5. ~. <br /> <br /> Case ~5: Request for Sketch Plan Review of a ~Or SUb.d~ision, Holiday <br /> Case of Lyndale Terra, al Comp~ <br /> Acres; <br /> <br /> ~imo Street. ~e prope~ consists of approx~ately 6.80 ~"~and is proposed to be <br /> pla~ed into ~o lots. Lot 1 will be appro~mately 1.40 acres ~:}Lot 2 is 5.40.acres. ~e <br /> prope~ is cu~ently zoned B-~ ,~?iness. ~e proposed par e?~?'half acre," <br /> minimum lot size requirement,:--:~.}'!~O0:foot width ~d 150 fo%~ "~'requirement <br /> <br /> Mb{13n C~ed. VO~h~ Yes: .... Cha~r~3n Nixt, Co~issioners Wivod~ Oh~s, <br /> <br />· ."'?~ase ~6: Reqfiest for Site Plan Review; Case of Lyndale Terminal Company <br /> <br /> Ci~ Counc~ deny si~plan approval of the proposed site pl~ for Holiday Acres b~ed on <br /> ~e denial o'f~e rezon'ing. <br /> <br /> Motion C~ed. Voting Yes: ChaiCerson Nixt, Co~issioners Kociscak, Gfiffiths,' <br /> Reeve, and Wivoda. Voting No: None. Absent: Co~ssioner Jonson. <br /> <br /> ":?Case'~7~ Proposed Ordnance to Amend Park Dedication Requ~ements <br /> <br /> .-:~ Public Hear~g <br /> <br />-243- <br /> <br /> <br />