Laserfiche WebLink
US 10 in Ramsey Timeline <br />November 1999: Mn/DOT releases the Interregional Corridor (IRC) Study. This study <br />shows US 10 as a high - priority IRC. <br />2001: Mn/DOT starts studies on some of the identified high - priority IRCs (I think it was <br />seven corridors — but I am not certain). US 10 is one of the corridors. <br />2002: US 10 IRC study is complete that recommends a freeway facility on US 10 <br />through the Cities of Anoka and Ramsey. <br />2004: The City of Ramsey completes an AUAR to preserve the land between the railroad <br />and US 10. <br />2004: MOU signed and City of Ramsey Officially maps corridor <br />2006 -2007: The City of Ramsey partners with Anoka County, Mn/DOT and the <br />Metropolitan Council in an access study that identifies locations and alternative options <br />for interchanges within the city. This study also suggests an interchange design for a <br />potential river crossing. <br />2007: Anoka County, the City of Ramsey and Mn/DOT partner with the Metropolitan <br />Council to identify interchange and access improvements between CSAH 57 (Sunfish <br />Lake Blvd) and CSAH 56 (Ramsey Blvd). An EA/EAW was completed in 2009. <br />2009: Anoka County and the City of Ramsey partner with Mn/DOT and the <br />Metropolitan Council to identify improvements at CSAH 83 (Armstrong Blvd). <br />Spring 2010: City Staff is made aware that MnDOT and Metropolitan Council are <br />considering drafting Transportation Policy Plan <br />May 21, 2010: City Staff hosts a meeting with the Metropolitan Council and MnDOT <br />staff to talk about the progress on Trunk Highway 10 <br />Summer 2010: Draft Transportation Policy plan released <br />October 7, 2010 Official comments from City of Ramsey submitted <br />February 9, 2011 Copy of conditional approval language received by MnDOT. <br />In the interim between the AUAR in 2004 and 2011, the City of Ramsey was working <br />with the Metropolitan Council to acquire willing property owners in the CSAH 57 and <br />CSAH 56 areas to accommodate the realignment of US 10 and the two identified <br />interchanges. <br />