Laserfiche WebLink
That the Subject Property was platted in 1948, has a lot width range of 80 to 100 feet, is .8 <br />acres in size, and has not been in separate ownership from abutting lands for approximately <br />45 years. <br /> <br />That the Applicant purchased Lots 30 and 3t in 1994, is proposing to sell his existing home <br />on Lot 31 and build a new home for himself on Lot 30; and to do so requires a variance to the <br />lot width and area requirements. <br /> <br />That the Applicant is also requesting a 94 foot variance to the 200 foot ordinary high water <br />mark setback requirement in order that the home developed on the Subject Property will be <br />on a sight line similar to that of the homes on Lots 29 and 31. <br /> <br />10. <br /> <br />That Section 9.21.07 (Critical River Overlay District Development Standards) does not <br />provide for an adjusted structure setback from the river when the adjacent lots have non- <br />conforming existing structures on them. <br /> <br />tt. <br /> <br />That Section 9.23.11 (Scenic River Administration) states that when a setback pattern from <br />the ordinary high water level already has been established on both sides of a proposed <br />building site, the setback of the proposed structure may be allowed to conform to that pattern. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />That when a property is subject to more than one standard, generally the more restrictive <br />shall apply. Therefore, Section 9.21.07 (Critical River Overlay District Development <br />Standards) would not provide for an adjusted structure setback from the river based on the <br />setback of adjacent structures. <br /> <br />13. <br /> <br />That County records indicate that there are currently six (6) cases of duo-ownership lots <br />(riparian and non-riparian) along Bowers Drive that do not meet the area and width <br />requirements of Section 9.21.07. <br /> <br />14. <br /> <br />That Section 9.2t.07 (Critical River Overlay District Development Standards) restricts <br />building height to 35 feet; the Applicant has stated that the proposed dwelling will not exceed <br />28 feet in height. <br /> <br />15. <br /> <br />That the Applicant has stated that strict enforcement of Section 9.21.07 of the Ramsey City <br />Code will result in unnecessary hardship as several homes were allowed to be developed on <br />substandard lots at reduced river setbacks in Mississippi Acres since the adoption of the <br />Critical River regulations in 1985 just because the respective lots were in separate ownership <br />from adjacent lots, and if he were required to build his house 200 feet from the ordinary high <br />water mark, his house would be the only one in the neighborhood required to do so to date. <br /> <br />16. <br /> <br />That Mary Nosh of 14500 Bowers Drive N.W. was present at the public hearing as one of 6 <br />owners of double lots on Bowers Drive and stated that they are paying a tax rate on the <br />vacant lot indicative of a buildable lot and is opposed to enforcing a 200 foot river setback on <br />the few remaining vacant lots. <br /> <br /> <br />