My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 03/06/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 03/06/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:21:53 AM
Creation date
9/9/2003 8:26:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
03/06/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #00-03- <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDING OF FACT/4 RELATING TO A REQUEST <br />FROM NORTH FORK, INC. FOR A GRADING PERMIT <br /> <br /> WltEREAS, the City of Ramsey received an application from North Fork, Inc. for a <br />grading permit to regrade the property legally described as follows: <br /> <br />Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, NORTHFORK LAKE ADDITION, Anoka County, Minnesota. <br />(the "Subj eot Property") <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THIS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA that the findings of fact relating <br />to the request are determined to be as follows: <br /> <br />That on February 15, 2000, North Fork, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Applicant", <br />properly applied for a grading permit to regrade property in the Northfork Planned Unit <br />Development. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />That the applicant appeared before ~he Ramsey Planning Commission for a public hearing <br />pursuant to Section 9.03.04 of the city Code on March 6, 2000, and that said public <br />hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby <br />incorporated as a part of these findings by reference. <br /> <br />That the subject property is located in a residential area of a Planned Unit Development <br />and the proposed area for grading is approximately two (2)'acres in size. <br /> <br />That on June 27, 1995 and again on August 26, 1997, the City issued a grading permit to <br />the Applicant to strip the topsoil, export approximately 15,000 cubic yards of earth <br />material, and replace the topsoil on the Subject property. <br /> <br />That the grading permits issued in 1995 and 1997 expired prior to initiation and <br />completion of the grading project. <br /> <br />That the City received a letter from the Applicant dated February 16, 2000 as an <br />addendum to the February 15, 2000 application for a grading permit, and that transmittal <br />stated that removal of the material from the site is cost prohibitive and the revised grading <br />plan proposes the movement of approximately 6,000 yards of material on the Subject <br />Property with no exporting of soils. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />That the revised grading plan prepared by Ulteig Engineers, Inc., dated May I6, 1995 and <br />revised November 3, 1999, proposes to regrade the Subject Property to create more <br />attractive building sites and save mature Oak trees. <br /> <br />That the Applicant has stated that the project should have minimal adverse impact on the <br />adjacent residential parcels as the project can be accomplished within a thirty (30) day <br />period. <br /> <br />9. That no fill materials is proposed to be imported to the site. <br /> <br />10. That no blasting will be employed in the grading activity. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.