My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 03/06/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 03/06/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:21:53 AM
Creation date
9/9/2003 8:26:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
03/06/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mallard Ponds Review Letter <br />March 3, 2000 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />I0. <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />Lot Areas: In the absence of updated zoning regulations per the newly drafted <br />Comprehensive Plan, Staff will be utilizing the current 15 unit/acre zoning district, <br />Multiple Residential (MR), as a guideline in establishing performance standards for this <br />proposed PUD. The MR district regulations establish a minimum lot size of 3,000 square <br />feet for multi-family structures in a PUD; ali of the townhouse lots are at least 3,300 <br />square feet in size. <br /> <br />Park Dedication: The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed plat on <br />February 10, 2000. Park dedication will consist of a cash payment in the mount of <br />$1,200 per townhouse unit, They also recommended the construction of a sidewalk along <br />140~ Lane N.W. to Dysprosium and south to County Road #116. This sidewalk is not <br />park dedication credit eligible. <br /> <br />Landscape Plan: Staff has reviewed the landscape plan dated February 14, 2000, noting <br />that it meets the minimum requirements provided that the plan addresses the following: <br /> <br />· The plan should identify which areas will receive irrigation. <br /> Tree save fences must be used in all areas with existing trees that are not to be <br /> disturbed. <br />· Increasing number of plantings on the north boundary to intensify screening <br /> eapability~ <br /> <br />In addition, staff is presuming that the homeowners association or others will be <br />responsible for additional landscaping beyond the "one tree and two shrubs per lot". <br />Also, the developer should consider an additional species or two for the front yard tree for <br />long term disease resistance and variety. Relative to the shrub types, it is noted that <br />spirea and barberrys are typically over used in landscapes. Also of note is that the second <br />item in the shrub key is Black Hills Spruce; this is acknowledged as an error. <br /> <br />Commercial/industrial properties have been required to place trees 35 feet on center or <br />less along frontage streets. The front yard trees in this development suffice for this <br />purpose, except for the road fight-of-way east of Dysprosium Street N.W., adjacent to the <br />two existing lots on the north and also on the south side of the street. These do not need <br />to be 2.5 caliper B&B trees. However, they must be of a size and vigor sufficient to <br />survive with minimal care. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.