My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/06/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/06/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:22:51 AM
Creation date
9/9/2003 8:47:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
06/06/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10. <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />That the architectural standards in the business district require natural or prefabricated <br />stone on building exteriors; any other material is subject to City Council approval. <br /> <br />That the Applicant is proposing to construct the exterior walls with a combination of <br />burnished concrete block, rock face block, utility block, face brick and smooth concrete <br />block. <br /> <br />That the applicant is proposing to have a flat roof. City Code states that flat roofs on non- <br />residential structures may be prohibited when such construction is deemed by the City to <br />be incompatible with surrounding residential development. <br /> <br />That the surrounding businesses all have pitched roofs and the property also abuts a <br />residential neighborhood to the south. <br /> <br />That the drainage and grading plan submitted are unacceptable due to the 85% proposed <br />impervious surface and poor drainage ~lanning. <br /> <br />t3~ That the plan proposes the stormwater nmoffinto the neighboring residential property. <br /> <br />14. That the plan does not provide the 40 foot "no activities" zone along the south property <br /> line as indicated in Ramsey City Code. <br /> <br />15. <br /> <br />16. <br /> <br />17. <br /> <br />18. <br /> <br />19. <br /> <br />20. <br /> <br />21. <br /> <br />22. <br /> <br />That the overall amounts of trees proposed to be planted are well below the standard tree <br />count for a property of this size. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will/will not be unduly dangerous or detrimental to persons residing <br />or working in the vicinity of the use, or to the public welfare. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will/will not substantially adversely impair the use, enjoyment or <br />market value of any surrounding property. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will/Mil not be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained so <br />as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character <br />of the general vicinity and will/will not change the essential character of the area. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will/will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future <br />neighboring uses. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will/will be a substantial improvement to the property. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will/will not be served adequately by essential public facilities and <br />services, such as highways, streets, police and fire protection. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will/will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost <br />for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the <br />community. <br /> RESOLUTION #00-05- <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.