Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Councilmember Kurak, seconded by Councilmember Cook, to adopt Ordinance #03- <br />26 to amend City Code with the addition of Section 7.15 (Rental Residential Dwelling Units) of <br />City Code regarding the licensing of rental housing. <br /> <br />A roll call vote was performed by the Recording Secretary: <br /> <br />Councilmember Pearson aye <br />Councilmember Elvig aye <br />Councilmember Strommen absent <br />Councilmember Kurak aye <br />Councihnember Cook aye <br />Councihnember Zimmerman aye <br />Mayor Gamec aye <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />Case #6: <br /> <br />Adopt Interim Ordinance to Establish Development Moratorium on the <br />Highway #10 Corridor <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak abstained from the discussion. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated that that MnDOT has developed an Interregional Corridor <br />(IRC) System, which identifies 2,930 miles of key transportation corridors that handled one-third <br />of the vehicle miles traveled in the State. One of those key corridors is T.H. #10 from T.H. #24 <br />in Clear Lake to 1-35W, which includes the City of Ramsey. Earlier this year, MnDOT released a <br />study document entitled T.H. #10 Corridor Management Plan: T.H. #24 in Clear Lake to 1-35W. <br />On January 18, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution #02-01-007 endorsing MnDOT's <br />vision and management plan for T.H. #10 and supported a freeway design from Thurston <br />Boulevard in Anoka to the western boundary of Ramsey. On November 12, 2002, the City <br />Council tabled action on the moratorium and suggested that the new Council take up the matter <br />of the moratorium on Highway #10 corridor. The new City Council contracted services with The <br />Tinklenberg Group in January 2003, to provide consulting services that would assist in <br />identifying tools and a strategy that could help guide staff and policymakers in effectively <br />managing development in planning for the fi~ture. The Tinklenberg Group recommended a <br />strategy including an environmental review that would allow the City to officially map portions <br />of the Corridor along Highway #10. The strategy also included a strong communication and <br />outreach effort with individual property owners. The Tinklenberg Group was available to answer <br />questions and provide better understanding of the planning activities that had been underway <br />prior to any policy decisions or official actions. While the technical portion of this work can be <br />completed in a relatively short timeframe, the potential for new development proposals in this <br />area remain an issue without a moratorium in place. In May 2003, The Tinklenberg Group <br />recommended that the City Council consider a six-month moratorium for the Corridor to <br />complete the technical portion of the Corridor Study. Legal notices were posted, the public <br />hearing was called for, and the ordinance introduction occurred at the July 8, 2003 City Council <br />meeting. <br /> <br />City Council/July 22, 2003 <br />Page 15 of 33 <br /> <br /> <br />