Laserfiche WebLink
That the Applicant's submittal includes an erosion control plan that includes an erosion <br />blanket and silt fence on the slope to minimize nm-off into the Rum River during <br />construction. <br /> <br />That the Applicant's submittal includes a restoration plan that will stabilize the slope, reduce <br />sediment run-off into the river, and re-establish native plants and grasses in the disturbed <br />area. <br /> <br />That in accordance with City Code, the Applicant's application submittal proposes to <br />perform the landscape alterations in a manner which minimizes earth_moving, erosion, tree <br />clearing, and the destruction of natural amenities. <br /> <br />10. That the proposed use will not be unduly dangerous or otherwise detrimental to persons <br /> residing or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. <br /> <br />t I. That the proposed use will not substantially adversely impair the use, enjoyment, or market <br /> value of any surrounding property. <br /> <br />12. That the proposed use will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring <br /> USES. <br /> <br />13. That the proposed use will be a substantial improvement to property in the immediate <br /> vic/nity and to the community as a whole. <br /> <br />14. That the proposed use wiI1 be served adequately by public facilities and services such as <br /> highways and streets. <br /> <br />15. That the proposed use Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for <br /> public facilities and services, and it will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the <br /> community. <br /> <br />16. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, and equipment <br />and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general <br />welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by CoUncilmember <br /> , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #97-09-287 <br /> · Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />